Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Incremental change" is a Third Way lie. [View all]
Last edited Sun May 10, 2015, 09:11 PM - Edit history (3)
See this thread by WillyT:
JFK: What it means to be Liberal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6652893
In JFK's own words:
[font size=3]"Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention, with political skill, and executive vigor."[/font size]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6652893
In JFK's own words:
[font size=3]"Our responsibility is not discharged by announcement of virtuous ends. Our responsibility is to achieve these objectives with social invention, with political skill, and executive vigor."[/font size]
Empty Third Way claims to care about the 99 percent, while bleating lies about "incrementalism" and fellating the One Percent...
That con game does not fly anymore.
The endless Third Way lecturing to be patient and trust "incremental change" is a rhetorical con game. It is a bid to believe a flat-out lie: that corporate politicians have the same goals we do but are merely moving toward them more slowly and pragmatically.
It is a lie. Third Way politicians and their propaganda mouthpieces do not have the same goals as traditional liberals. They work for Wall Street and corporations, and their purpose is to use slick advertising and manipulation to sell you a product that will increase their own power and profit.
To claim that progress is being made but is merely incremental is overwhelmingly untrue in the most important areas of policy. We are being thrown bones on social issues but inequality has been escalated viciously through policy, the power of corporations is being relentlessly increased, our fundamental civil liberties are being dismantled, journalism is under assault, peaceful protesters are being surveilled and brutally suppressed, whistleblowers are being persecuted, our president has claimed the right to imprison indefinitely and even kill without due process, militarization of our police forces has been expanded, our public education system is being corporatized and even dismantled, corporate power over the internet has still not been denied, and our environment is being opened to drilling and fracking. In addition to all this, this government is engaging in mass surveillance against its own citizens and assaulting us with propaganda and disinformation.
Corporatists have been installed in virtually every area of government by our Democratic president.
The most significant policy proposal on the horizon is the most predatory free trade agreement in history, which will force Americans to compete with workers in Third World countries. It will kill jobs, reduce wages for over 90 percent of American workers, restrict freedom on the internet, make obtaining life-saving medications more difficult and more expensive, and allow multinational corporations to sue for profits and overrule national decisions on everything from wages to regulations for environment and safety. It is an assault on all of us, and it is unconscionable coming from a Democratic president. However, it is wholly consistent with this administration's long record of working on behalf of corporate interests.
Nothing is fixed unless we are honest about what is happening. All the propaganda notwithstanding, more and more courageous liberals are standing up to do just that. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Robert Reich....the launch of FirstLook....Bill Moyers' excellent work....These are all positive signs.
People who care deeply about this country are telling the truth about what we really are facing...the corporate hijacking of our party and our government....because the rose-colored glasses are malignant. The rose-colored glasses are a corporate lie, and they prevent real change.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who said a new president is enough to change the system?? No one I know believes
sabrina 1
May 2015
#118
it's not so much that we are conned, it's that by the general election our choice is down to getting
yurbud
May 2015
#24
So what happens to our incremental change/evolution when the eco-system collapses?
jalan48
May 2015
#53
wrong again, but I expect little in the way of facts from a BOG er in his twenties
Doctor_J
May 2015
#123
I think the Tories were begging our Founders for incremental change. "Please don't revolt"
rhett o rick
May 2015
#121
In 2008, we had a Majorities & a window throught which Single Payer could have been passed....
bvar22
May 2015
#132
when you say fan club… are referring to some DU'ers? Cause you then call the fan club
KittyWampus
May 2015
#33
And in the OP - fellating sheep. Way to insult friends and influence no one.
bettyellen
May 2015
#119
They stick the knife in you 9 inches, pull it out six, and tell you they just made your life better.
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#39
It's all a game to you, isn't it - and it is important to blindly follow your "hero"
NRaleighLiberal
May 2015
#16
Yes, but most are only aware of how presidencies have responded to those social movements
BainsBane
May 2015
#57
Edit: Their mission is to turn the ECONOMIC polocies of the Democratic Party into the
LondonReign2
May 2015
#144
So, you'd be happier with no health care change if we couldn't get single-payer?
brooklynite
May 2015
#18
The con is that "we couldn't' get single-payer" - the WH never wanted to get it...
polichick
May 2015
#19
The delusion is that we could. You can't even outline a way it would have passed.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#37
You are absolutely correct. This man could have achieved anything. ANYTHING! Greatest mandate ever!
Enthusiast
May 2015
#149
Barack Obama banned health insurers from discriminating against pre-existing conditions,
Nye Bevan
May 2015
#25
incremental outcomes are acceptable IF you went balls to the wall for the ideal first
yurbud
May 2015
#26
And they can get away with this because it has been prearranged with the media to never mention
Enthusiast
May 2015
#156
yep. Except it is treated as unremarkable when Republicans pull out all the stops including
yurbud
May 2015
#161
Unfortunately, banks, corporations and wealthy individuals aren't "pragmatic incrementalists".
pa28
May 2015
#30
Unless you are a corporation who has lobbyists and a large donation to make or withhold
dreamnightwind
May 2015
#70
"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy.."
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#64
Amen: Look at the dramatic changes to this nation from the Patriot Act alone.
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#107
Never mind that Sanders, Warren, FDR and Kennedy all worked to effect change. Often incrementally.
riqster
May 2015
#86