Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

1939

(1,683 posts)
2. Not necessarily big oil
Tue May 12, 2015, 10:10 AM
May 2015

States, counties, and municipalities across the US are competing for businesses to locate there. To get the business to choose their locality instead of another, they compete with enticements/subsidies/bribes usually in terms of free/cheap land, infrastructure (road/sewer) improvements, workforce training, and property/business tax rebates. Companies seek the best offer available. The rationale for offering these enticements/subsidies/bribes is the real or potential increase in jobs/taxes/satellite business start ups which contribute to the economy of the area. The localities are hopeful to get back in benefits more than they give up in subsidies. The risk in this analysis is lessened if the company receiving the subsidies is very profitable. Another factor is that a refinery is much less likely to just pack up and move to greener pastures.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US taxpayers subsidising ...»Reply #2