Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Constitutional horror: Clarence Thomas argues states can establish official religion [View all]Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)59. It appears he would like to see Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing swept away.
Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing
The establishment of religion clause means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government may set up a church. Neither can pass laws that aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion . Neither a state or the federal government may, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state.
The establishment of religion clause means at least this: Neither a state nor the federal government may set up a church. Neither can pass laws that aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion . Neither a state or the federal government may, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state.
The Roberts Court has not been shy about weeping aside established law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Constitutional horror: Clarence Thomas argues states can establish official religion [View all]
KamaAina
May 2015
OP
No its not but but the precedent of application to the states is mostly settled.
yellowcanine
May 2015
#80
I do not think that is what the founders had in mind when they wrote Ammendment I
Stuart G
May 2015
#4
Correct! The Incorporation Clause of the 14th Amendment applied the Bill of Rights to.......
LongTomH
May 2015
#78
OMG! Fuck that shit! I'm not going to have some fairy tale forced on me by ANY government! WTF
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#5
Notice that the article, from last year, does not quote Thomas or identify the decision
jberryhill
May 2015
#27
it was a poor article, about Town of Greece, NY v. Galloway 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014)
steve2470
May 2015
#71
Thomas - do you understand that state religion was what most of our ancestors camne to this
jwirr
May 2015
#11
After the state religion would not allow them to practice their own religion. All over Europe they
jwirr
May 2015
#18
The early settlers all came on the same ships, lived in a certain area where they started their own
jwirr
May 2015
#81
The dictionary definition indicates the Church of England as an exampe. A church that by law is
jwirr
May 2015
#91
Makes about as much sense as saying the First Amendment doesn't apply to blasphemy...
Dr. Strange
May 2015
#15
It appears he would like to see Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing swept away.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2015
#59