Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Constitutional horror: Clarence Thomas argues states can establish official religion [View all]Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)60. Establishment clause overview
Establishment clause overview
Friday, September 16, 2011
The first of the First Amendments two religion clauses reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . Note that the clause is absolute. It allows no law. It is also noteworthy that the clause forbids more than the establishment of religion by the government. It forbids even laws respecting an establishment of religion. The establishment clause sets up a line of demarcation between the functions and operations of the institutions of religion and government in our society. It does so because the framers of the First Amendment recognized that when the roles of the government and religion are intertwined, the result too often has been bloodshed or oppression.
For the first 150 years of our nations history, there were very few occasions for the courts to interpret the establishment clause because the First Amendment had not yet been applied to the states. As written, the First Amendment applied only to Congress and the federal government. In the wake of the Civil War, however, the 14th Amendment was adopted. It reads in part that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law . In 1947 the Supreme Court held in Everson v. Board of Education that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due-process clause. From that point on, all government action, whether at the federal, state, or local level, must abide by the restrictions of the establishment clause.
Friday, September 16, 2011
The first of the First Amendments two religion clauses reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . Note that the clause is absolute. It allows no law. It is also noteworthy that the clause forbids more than the establishment of religion by the government. It forbids even laws respecting an establishment of religion. The establishment clause sets up a line of demarcation between the functions and operations of the institutions of religion and government in our society. It does so because the framers of the First Amendment recognized that when the roles of the government and religion are intertwined, the result too often has been bloodshed or oppression.
For the first 150 years of our nations history, there were very few occasions for the courts to interpret the establishment clause because the First Amendment had not yet been applied to the states. As written, the First Amendment applied only to Congress and the federal government. In the wake of the Civil War, however, the 14th Amendment was adopted. It reads in part that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law . In 1947 the Supreme Court held in Everson v. Board of Education that the establishment clause is one of the liberties protected by the due-process clause. From that point on, all government action, whether at the federal, state, or local level, must abide by the restrictions of the establishment clause.
A very good article that covers the Establishment clause.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Constitutional horror: Clarence Thomas argues states can establish official religion [View all]
KamaAina
May 2015
OP
No its not but but the precedent of application to the states is mostly settled.
yellowcanine
May 2015
#80
I do not think that is what the founders had in mind when they wrote Ammendment I
Stuart G
May 2015
#4
Correct! The Incorporation Clause of the 14th Amendment applied the Bill of Rights to.......
LongTomH
May 2015
#78
OMG! Fuck that shit! I'm not going to have some fairy tale forced on me by ANY government! WTF
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#5
Notice that the article, from last year, does not quote Thomas or identify the decision
jberryhill
May 2015
#27
it was a poor article, about Town of Greece, NY v. Galloway 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014)
steve2470
May 2015
#71
Thomas - do you understand that state religion was what most of our ancestors camne to this
jwirr
May 2015
#11
After the state religion would not allow them to practice their own religion. All over Europe they
jwirr
May 2015
#18
The early settlers all came on the same ships, lived in a certain area where they started their own
jwirr
May 2015
#81
The dictionary definition indicates the Church of England as an exampe. A church that by law is
jwirr
May 2015
#91
Makes about as much sense as saying the First Amendment doesn't apply to blasphemy...
Dr. Strange
May 2015
#15
It appears he would like to see Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing swept away.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2015
#59