Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

loses. LWolf May 2015 #1
I think it's going to backfire on them Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #3
K&R. CharlotteVale May 2015 #2
Until his numbers come up to show that he actually can be procon May 2015 #4
Yet GOP candidates with decimal level support are getting more TEEVEE exposure NorthCarolina May 2015 #5
The fact that Biden, who will absolutely not run, is polling at 11% tells LondonReign2 May 2015 #18
And name recognition is one of the primary reasons procon May 2015 #29
Biden's "poll numbers" are the result of name recognition from being the VP LondonReign2 May 2015 #33
It doesn't change the dynamic. procon May 2015 #34
You can try to wish away Sanders candidacy all you want LondonReign2 May 2015 #37
Biden isn't running. Adrahil May 2015 #42
Disagree. The media - even the M$M like to have something to talk about erronis May 2015 #6
What a witty insult ("HRH")... brooklynite May 2015 #8
You are currently suffering from an affliction called Hillary Adoration Syndrome eloydude May 2015 #38
Adoration? far from it... brooklynite May 2015 #40
I will vote for her, if she is the Democratic nominee. eloydude May 2015 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #54
Don't forget; Hillary doesn't speak... cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #17
Tell ya what.... Adrahil May 2015 #43
I donated my absolute last dollar to politicians a long time ago. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #49
That'd be a no then? Adrahil May 2015 #60
Hello Tom, donnasgirl May 2015 #7
+1. Funny how "marginal" is now being thrown around like "liberal" used to be. erronis May 2015 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #56
I haven't called him marginal once. But he wont win a single primary. Adrahil May 2015 #44
I understand what you say to a point donnasgirl May 2015 #58
We shall see. Adrahil May 2015 #61
Know who else was considered a marginal candidate? Dennis Kucinich. brooklynite May 2015 #9
And they appeal to the same folks. The same group was convinced each had a shot. nt stevenleser May 2015 #14
little chance against nationally better-known politicians; his name recognition was two percent... LanternWaste May 2015 #15
Ha, you posted this while I had my screen open for essentially making the same reply n/t Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #19
Jimmy Carter, while not well-known, was seen as a mainstream Democrat... brooklynite May 2015 #23
No two eletion cycles are the same when you scratch the surface. Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #24
Good points here . . . markpkessinger May 2015 #36
Possibly. But that's a really long shot. n/t Adrahil May 2015 #45
Jimmy Carter was called a "marginal candidate" for a long time. Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #16
Against the House minority leader appointed President from a scandal wracked party? How did he do? stevenleser May 2015 #21
Well then one would think some non marginal Democratic politician would have won the nomination Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #22
Nope, it was a weak year featuring a young Jerry Brown and George "Segragationist" Wallace stevenleser May 2015 #30
That's misleading Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #35
Muskie was a victim of Nixon's Dirty Tricks Team Art_from_Ark May 2015 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #55
Funny you should mention the 2004 elections Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #20
Anyone who voted against the non UN sanctioned preemptive fraudulent Iraq war was marginalized.... think May 2015 #28
Not so great. IMO, too ideological. OTOH, Bernie comes across as pragmatic. immoderate May 2015 #32
We shall see. If you're right, I'll work hard for him. Adrahil May 2015 #46
Exactly MaggieD May 2015 #59
They're going to try to ignore him first, as with the DNC's exclusivity agreement limiting debates. Marr May 2015 #10
K&R - The DNC has got to be in fever pitch right now! erronis May 2015 #13
Well, you can rest assured Bernie will meet at least one of your expectations. Second in NH. nt stevenleser May 2015 #12
Let me make that correction for you. Bernie'll finish first in NH by a blowout. eloydude May 2015 #39
And then you woke up... Nt stevenleser May 2015 #48
They maginalized Jesse Ventura right up... 99Forever May 2015 #25
"they" the MN politicians also critically marginalized someone else... HereSince1628 May 2015 #31
New Hampshire already knows Bernie, so good luck MSM tearing him down! TheNutcracker May 2015 #26
I'm not surprised he's being marginalized. That was always going to be his staring point. Orsino May 2015 #27
Silly! Bernie can only win if Wall Street and the banksters fund his campaign. Got it? L0oniX May 2015 #47
Very interesting BrotherIvan May 2015 #50
My vote will matter. sgtbenobo May 2015 #51
If Bernie received half as much negative comments as Hillary receives here you just may have Thinkingabout May 2015 #53
They have to bash Hillary leftofcool May 2015 #57
Yes, guess you are right. Thinkingabout May 2015 #62
My tone in the OP was intentionally non complaining, I made an observation Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #63
Let me ask this question, how much do you think it is helping Bernie for the backers of Bernie Thinkingabout May 2015 #64
I'm Pro Bernie, not Anti-Hillary Tom Rinaldo May 2015 #66
Sounds good, we want to elect Democrats. Thinkingabout May 2015 #67
K&R! Omaha Steve May 2015 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The More They Attempt to ...»Reply #16