Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PosterChild

(1,307 posts)
29. The artcle provides some insight into this...
Tue May 12, 2015, 08:45 PM
May 2015

“You can’t negotiate something as complex as this in public,” he said.

The reason is that a complex multinational agreement requires many different trade offs and compromises. We seek what is good for us, they seek what is good for them. The whole package must be on average good for all, but any one provision, in issolation, that may be good for us will be viewed as bad by them, and what, in issolation, may be good for them will be viewed as bad by us. It's only by putting them together that you get a deal that can be considered good by all.

When the various provisions are discussed piecmeal and in public, judgements are made on issolated provisions without understanding how they might fit into an overall agreement. Opportunities to understand what they are interested in, to explore various possibilities, and to experiment with new combinations are lost. Opportunities are lost- to all sides. Progress is stalled, stasis sets in, and then regression.

So the best strategy is to proceed with a level of cofidentiality, bring in experts and representatives of various interests as needed, and then provide a complete package for examimation, debate, and an up or down vote.

This is, by the way, the way the Iran nuclear treaty is being pursued. It's the only way such agreement can be acomplished.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Insider view on the "secret" TPP [View all] PosterChild May 2015 OP
He's someone who stands to benefit from it. cali May 2015 #1
Excellent article, more proof it's not just big corporations privy to what's going on. Hoyt May 2015 #2
....l. cali May 2015 #3
Yeah, me and every country that has signed a trade agreement and hopes to attract businesses to Hoyt May 2015 #5
The WTO Trade Dispute Resolution Body is state-on-state. The TPP formalizes customary int'l law leveymg May 2015 #8
Governments can sue businesses in their own courts, as has been the case for hundreds of years. Hoyt May 2015 #9
No ability to counter-sue in the same forum is a definite liability in litigation leveymg May 2015 #12
You posted as if countries have no recourse if a company violates their laws. That is not true. Hoyt May 2015 #14
The defendant state has no recourse to countersue in the same forum, under the draft TPP leveymg May 2015 #15
They don't need it, they can haul them into their own courts, which presumably will be Hoyt May 2015 #16
Obama and the USTR are committed to the TPP which will benefit US-based MNCs leveymg May 2015 #17
And when other countries sign, they all are saying the small risk under ISDS is worth it to Hoyt May 2015 #18
Different states have different constituencies. The cost/benefits of this treaty vary. The threat leveymg May 2015 #21
Yeesh MFrohike May 2015 #40
Philip Morris has gotten nowhere in Australia. Australian packaging laws are still in effect. Hoyt May 2015 #42
Again, you make no sense MFrohike May 2015 #43
I disagree, and fact Australia is ready to sign another agreement with similar tribunals indicates Hoyt May 2015 #44
Heh MFrohike May 2015 #45
Thanks for the post! PosterChild May 2015 #24
You missed this quote when you went cherry picking... Jesus Malverde May 2015 #4
And - it looks like the TPP has more corporate protections than it does actual trade agreements. djean111 May 2015 #6
Like the "confidential briefings" congress received to convince them to invade Iraq bananas May 2015 #7
The "insider" also said “I’m not going to lie to you. I don’t know what the hell is in the TPP, and RiverLover May 2015 #10
LOL...well I guess there is THAT. n/t Oilwellian May 2015 #22
Of course not... PosterChild May 2015 #25
Thanks for that quote. Makes a big difference. madfloridian May 2015 #32
Obama went to Oregon to push Congress on trade agreements LWolf May 2015 #11
Inside what? He knows jack apple shit. TheKentuckian May 2015 #13
He is.. PosterChild May 2015 #26
Per him, he doesn't shit. Direct quote follows. TheKentuckian May 2015 #36
Funny-- I remember reading articles exactly like this one when NAFTA was being pushed. Marr May 2015 #19
The propaganda machine is up and running n/t Oilwellian May 2015 #23
K & R nt okaawhatever May 2015 #20
Cool story, bro. 99Forever May 2015 #27
And TRUE too! How cool is that? /nt/ PosterChild May 2015 #30
Of course it is 99Forever May 2015 #31
Without a doubt and... PosterChild May 2015 #33
Or honesty. 99Forever May 2015 #34
Honestly speaking... PosterChild May 2015 #35
"This is really going to help you." "What's really going to help me." Binkie The Clown May 2015 #28
The artcle provides some insight into this... PosterChild May 2015 #29
That makes sense, but... Binkie The Clown May 2015 #38
What a maroon. GeorgeGist May 2015 #37
Who? you? Cha May 2015 #41
About as credible as Saddam and the incubator babies n/t brentspeak May 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Insider view on the &...»Reply #29