Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Wed May 13, 2015, 05:44 AM May 2015

President Obama plays the 'China Card'. Is he correct in asserting the U.S. [View all]

can "write the rules on trade"?

<snip>

Xi Jinping, the Chinese president and head of the Communist Party, is making a parallel pitch — but rooted in a very different strategy for gaining global influence. Mr. Xi has essentially shrugged off the question of whether his nation, the world’s second-largest economy, will join the pact. Instead, he has picked off American allies like Britain, Germany and South Korea to join, against the administration’s wishes, the Asian Infrastructure Investment bank, a project started by China in part to keep its own state-owned firms busy building roads, dams and power plants around Asia.

<snip>

America’s strategy since the 1990s, when Bill Clinton wooed Republican votes to get China into the World Trade Organization, has been a straightforward one: Entice China into institutions that operate according to Western standards of trade rules, labor practices and the protection of intellectual property, gradually changing the way a rising power rises. Mr. Clinton made that case in visits to Beijing, arguing that if China opened its doors to trade, new ideas and the internet would inevitably pressure its leaders toward democracy and freer expression.

It was a view that, in retrospect, overestimated American influence and underestimated the degree to which the Chinese believed they could amend the global order to suit their own economic interests. So while Mr. Obama plays the China card to sell the accord in the United States, the Chinese are pursuing their own course.

China has been excluded from the negotiations on the trade deal because it has been unwilling to sign on, so far, to the wide-ranging reforms of its economy required of all members. It could join later on — and Chinese officials have left open that possibility, as have nations like South Korea. But for now, China seems in no rush. Just as it created an infrastructure bank to suit its own ambitions, it is assembling trade agreements whose rules it can write by virtue of the huge size of its market.

<snip>

“The Chinese government knows the TPP is a major attempt by the U.S. to win back economic leadership in the region,” Mr. Shi said. “China also knows the Asia Pacific region is such a wide region, so you can have two stages. One is led by the U.S., which is pushing the TPP. The other is dominated by China.”

Mr. Shi said China was not worried about the TPP because Asia was a vast enough region to allow for multiple trade agreements. “This is far from a zero-sum game,” he said. “In the future, both countries will find places of cooperation as well as competition.”

<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/us/politics/as-obama-plays-china-card-on-trade-chinese-pursue-their-own-deals.html?_r=0

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As I said this is all about China malaise May 2015 #1
I think it's far more that China is being used as a pretext, a boogeyman cali May 2015 #2
Maybe it's more about China than trade, that's what I was getting from reading jakeXT May 2015 #7
Precisely n/t malaise May 2015 #14
Chinese are smarter than many "democrats".... MaggieD May 2015 #22
I think Obama is 100% correct on the TPP Yorktown May 2015 #3
And what about the US? TM99 May 2015 #4
+1. thanks for making those important points. cali May 2015 #6
Yes, I thought of that objection when typing my previous post Yorktown May 2015 #8
please post some evidence to support this claim: cali May 2015 #11
Kindly do not call my arguments worth zero upfront Yorktown May 2015 #16
Please elaborate on: cali May 2015 #5
Some answers Yorktown May 2015 #10
compared to our military interventions, that's some weak sauce. cali May 2015 #13
You ask too many questions too fast Yorktown May 2015 #19
It may be about China, but maybe not about territorial claims HereSince1628 May 2015 #21
Obama is dead on right about China MaggieD May 2015 #9
Declarative statements without any supporting evidence are as worthless as a scrap cali May 2015 #12
He's still correct on that point MaggieD May 2015 #15
Declarative statements without any supporting evidence are as worthless cali May 2015 #17
So is it secret or not secret? MaggieD May 2015 #18
Cali... C'mon.... That's kinda gross. Adrahil May 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama plays the...