Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I can guarantee you that he would appoint at least 2 maybe 3 liberal Supreme Court judges notadmblnd May 2015 #1
He would have to get them confirmed after appointing, so we need 60 Democrats in the Senate. Thinkingabout May 2015 #4
HRC would also have to get 60 votes as would any Republian President appointing conservative judges notadmblnd May 2015 #5
Exactly, this is how the process works, it is more than the president nominating the judge. Thinkingabout May 2015 #7
He would stick to his morals and promises marym625 May 2015 #2
Fight Nite Owl May 2015 #3
Get real. procon May 2015 #10
The president has the bully pulpit AgingAmerican May 2015 #14
Yes, he has the bully pulpit procon May 2015 #21
Defeatism: an attitude of accepting, expecting, or being resigned to defeat AgingAmerican May 2015 #24
Faith and name-calling are very poor substitutes for evidence. Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #27
Strawman AgingAmerican May 2015 #28
That is not a strawman. That person in no way misconstrued your argument. stevenleser May 2015 #55
It's a strawman AgingAmerican May 2015 #56
Only if you don't know what a strawman means. That person got your argument exactly right. nt stevenleser May 2015 #57
A straw man is a common form of argument and is a fallacy based on false representation of AgingAmerican May 2015 #58
And they did not falsely represent your position at all. Your position involved faith & namecalling. stevenleser May 2015 #59
Defeatism isn't a 'name' AgingAmerican May 2015 #60
You are saying it is defeatism right? So folks saying it are, by implication, being defeatist. stevenleser May 2015 #61
So you refuse to watch it AgingAmerican May 2015 #62
Watch what? nt stevenleser May 2015 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author AgingAmerican May 2015 #23
Exactly Nite Owl May 2015 #31
Meh, pretty words. nt Bobbie Jo May 2015 #64
Unless he compromised, nothing. He would accomplish nothing. n/t Lil Missy May 2015 #6
Psychopaths don't compromise AgingAmerican May 2015 #18
WTF? nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #39
List the compromises we got from the GOP psychopaths AgingAmerican May 2015 #42
No thanks Dr. Frist. Nt NCTraveler May 2015 #44
Gallup Poll Finds Democrats More Compassionate; Republicans More Psychopathic AgingAmerican May 2015 #46
You are very poorly educated on terms. Very poorly. nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #50
Don't take my word for it AgingAmerican May 2015 #65
God, this forum has jumped the shark. nt sufrommich May 2015 #40
Be nice. NCTraveler May 2015 #41
List the compromises the GOP gave AgingAmerican May 2015 #43
Exactly, so why bother caring about it? Fumesucker May 2015 #8
For him to even win the nomination it's going to have to be a huge popular uprising Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #9
The House will stay stuffed with Republicans until 2020. procon May 2015 #12
I still think voting has an impact on the US House races. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #16
That'd not how gerrymandering works. procon May 2015 #22
There are still alot of districts where the margin of victory is under 10%. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #37
He sure as hell would not shame TM99 May 2015 #11
+1 and he'd never use Social Security as a bargaining chip. CharlotteVale May 2015 #19
Yes! TM99 May 2015 #25
At least keep the crooks out of his own administration, cease dragnet surveillance, stop TheKentuckian May 2015 #13
Let's find out. Marr May 2015 #15
+1 CharlotteVale May 2015 #20
THIS. +1 LWolf May 2015 #45
Defeatism AgingAmerican May 2015 #17
But how can Bernie do anything against that Republican Senate? MelungeonWoman May 2015 #48
It's called the 'Bully Pulpit". AgingAmerican May 2015 #49
The entirety of the rationale behind support for Hillary is defeatism. Maedhros May 2015 #51
It isn't a very good way to win people over AgingAmerican May 2015 #53
How to Solve America's Biggest Problems with Bernie Sanders! AgingAmerican May 2015 #26
He will irritate Republicans to total irrationality. gordianot May 2015 #29
So - why care if he is president, if no Democratic president could get anything done? djean111 May 2015 #30
They are defeatists AgingAmerican May 2015 #32
Actually they are just (subtly, they think :-)) trying to discourage Bernie's supporters. djean111 May 2015 #33
They have used defeatism to excuse Obama's failings AgingAmerican May 2015 #34
Yes, defeatism is just the excuse. You are right, there. djean111 May 2015 #35
So basically we're screwed with Sanders or Clinton or Chafee or whoever enters the race? ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #36
Would it matter? sufrommich May 2015 #38
Tax the rich and their corporations... Octafish May 2015 #47
RedStateBlues is correct JustAnotherGen May 2015 #52
He would achieve in proportion to his salesmanship... Orsino May 2015 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would a President Sa...»Reply #45