Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
42. Well naming them is called a call out per the rules.
Wed May 13, 2015, 11:43 PM
May 2015

but since I will not name names, it is a faction here. It is a conservative faction, and it is loud. It is not limited to this site at all, and it has been discussed by party members at different levels of state democratic parties.

In fact, this no fuss primary has even made it all the way to the Wall Street Journal. But you can take my word on this or not, if you do any level of political reporting, you have come across this. I just shake my head, but it is out there.


The Democratic political establishment isn’t all that eager to talk about it publicly, but make no mistake: Many prominent figures in the party would just as soon avoid a hard-fought, contested primary in the 2016 presidential race.

What they seem to prefer instead is a no-muss, no-fuss nomination season with the party coalescing behind former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The strategy has certain advantages. Democrats could build a formidable war chest and sit back while Republican candidates wrestle for the GOP nomination.

This isn’t how the Democrats typically do business. In 1980, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy challenged a sitting president, Jimmy Carter, for the Democratic nomination. Sen. Bill Bradley took a shot against incumbent Vice President Al Gore in 2000. And, yes, in 2008 a first-term senator named Barack Obama successfully challenged the candidate who seemed the prohibitive front-runner: Mrs. Clinton.


http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/17/democrats-seek-no-fuss-primary-in-2016-race/

Yes, it is going back to 1968. And yes, it is a very specific faction represented on this website well.

It is not a mystery either, why all the push back that it is getting from the other prominent faction on this site. That would be the progressives.

As I said in the OP, imagine a primary, I will add now, with two or more candidates. Of course, a muscular primary also makes for a better story, so there is some self interest there. But it also leads to a better prepared nominee.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

... Agschmid May 2015 #1
The US Constitution, pesky thing nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #2
Sure... Agschmid May 2015 #4
That is what primaries are about nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #5
Determining whether Vermin Supreme is qualified to be President... Agschmid May 2015 #6
I think that you are ignoring the constitution at your peril nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #8
Sure we agree, get the candidates out there but we don't need to hear from everyone. Agschmid May 2015 #11
Alas you never hear from all of them nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #14
I don't think anyone here wants to skip the primary... Agschmid May 2015 #15
I would beg to differ given the posts on this site nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #17
+1000 Angry Dragon May 2015 #9
The US Constitution I know pesky thing nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #10
Yes we both get that. Agschmid May 2015 #12
If you read that, it is due to my poor communication skills nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #16
Just because one is old enough and Angry Dragon May 2015 #19
I am talking of Constitutional requirements nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #20
I think it should be time for ALL politicians Angry Dragon May 2015 #21
Good luck with that one nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #23
There would be tests ...lots of tests Angry Dragon May 2015 #25
Good test takers can still get around. nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #27
No doubt you know precisely what those tests would consist of... LanternWaste May 2015 #30
Yes I do Angry Dragon May 2015 #32
I think it's funny that Hillary supporters force me to find proof that she's not one of us.... NYC_SKP May 2015 #3
What I find curious is that nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #7
Yes and again... Everyone on here seems to agree with you. Agschmid May 2015 #28
I am going from posts I am seeing here nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #31
Link me to a post where it says we should skip the primary entirely... Agschmid May 2015 #37
I do not have to, but it is still damn easy to find them if you open your eyes to them nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #38
Nadin that post absolutely does not advocate for cancelling the primary. Agschmid May 2015 #45
I dislike the sound of this, because it implies someone deciding who is and isn't "qualified". Donald Ian Rankin May 2015 #13
Qulification is clearly in the US Constition nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18
The problem, as I see it, consists of two sadoldgirl May 2015 #22
A national super Sunday nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #24
Yeah 2 is really strong Johonny May 2015 #26
Yes. Agschmid May 2015 #29
Nader is a completely different issue. Jim Lane May 2015 #33
Whether right or wrong in your view he had a right nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #34
I knew it. I fucking KNEW it. Jim Lane May 2015 #35
The strawman is that it is implied nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #36
You feel comfortable reading in an implication when I expressly disclaimed it? Jim Lane May 2015 #39
I am just telling you how it feels nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #40
OK, then I'll tell you how it feels to me. Jim Lane May 2015 #41
Well naming them is called a call out per the rules. nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #42
So you're unhappy with the election after all of three weeks...with seven months to go. brooklynite May 2015 #43
Look I am in CA...so by the time the primary gets here nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Imagine a Primary Season ...»Reply #42