Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Imagine a Primary Season where voters actually hear from all qualified candidates [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)42. Well naming them is called a call out per the rules.
but since I will not name names, it is a faction here. It is a conservative faction, and it is loud. It is not limited to this site at all, and it has been discussed by party members at different levels of state democratic parties.
In fact, this no fuss primary has even made it all the way to the Wall Street Journal. But you can take my word on this or not, if you do any level of political reporting, you have come across this. I just shake my head, but it is out there.
The Democratic political establishment isnt all that eager to talk about it publicly, but make no mistake: Many prominent figures in the party would just as soon avoid a hard-fought, contested primary in the 2016 presidential race.
What they seem to prefer instead is a no-muss, no-fuss nomination season with the party coalescing behind former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The strategy has certain advantages. Democrats could build a formidable war chest and sit back while Republican candidates wrestle for the GOP nomination.
This isnt how the Democrats typically do business. In 1980, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy challenged a sitting president, Jimmy Carter, for the Democratic nomination. Sen. Bill Bradley took a shot against incumbent Vice President Al Gore in 2000. And, yes, in 2008 a first-term senator named Barack Obama successfully challenged the candidate who seemed the prohibitive front-runner: Mrs. Clinton.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/03/17/democrats-seek-no-fuss-primary-in-2016-race/
Yes, it is going back to 1968. And yes, it is a very specific faction represented on this website well.
It is not a mystery either, why all the push back that it is getting from the other prominent faction on this site. That would be the progressives.
As I said in the OP, imagine a primary, I will add now, with two or more candidates. Of course, a muscular primary also makes for a better story, so there is some self interest there. But it also leads to a better prepared nominee.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Imagine a Primary Season where voters actually hear from all qualified candidates [View all]
nadinbrzezinski
May 2015
OP
Sure we agree, get the candidates out there but we don't need to hear from everyone.
Agschmid
May 2015
#11
I think it's funny that Hillary supporters force me to find proof that she's not one of us....
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#3
I do not have to, but it is still damn easy to find them if you open your eyes to them
nadinbrzezinski
May 2015
#38
I dislike the sound of this, because it implies someone deciding who is and isn't "qualified".
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2015
#13
You feel comfortable reading in an implication when I expressly disclaimed it?
Jim Lane
May 2015
#39
So you're unhappy with the election after all of three weeks...with seven months to go.
brooklynite
May 2015
#43