This message was self-deleted by its author

[NCTraveler]

13. They are politicians playing the game.

It's what they do. Simple fact is, the ideas they have with respect to winning the game are personal and based in ideology. Their views are much better than the r's. In the game they play, a victorious outcome would be awesome. Unfortunately, the legislation you mentioned is political and a part of the game. What is that game? It is getting society more comfortable in addressing these issues in a better way. Their technique is very important and often takes decades to show results. It is why they are great in the senate. It is also why Sanders will be great on the campaign trail. Making society more comfortable discussing a stronger government role is hugely important. It is the exact same thing that drives Regan's popularity. They are also staying on message. They are going after their base and doing so very effectively by sticking with a select few topics. They do not have tons of info out on them, other than a few issues, and that makes them very friendly to certain types of people into politics. The real difference is what they feel to be the successful outcome to the game. They are actually the same outcomes Hillary would like. Difference there? Hillary knows the rules of the game and how to actually accomplish things along the way that will lead to victory. All three of them are extremely necessary in order to make progress. They are on the same team, playing different positions. Warren, Sanders, and Hillary know that. It is why they often work very well together and have such great respect for one and other. they understand the importance of the game and how to get things done.

Grayson. I learned a while back not to talk about him here. His game is clear. His game looks nothing like that of Sanders or Warren.