Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Methane emissions, you say?
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:15 PM
May 2015

Would that include those infamous Vermont dairy COW FARTS...?

On a serious note, that's being addressed with, among other things, changes to feed--who knew?

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/06/13/putting-end-gassy-cows-253463.html

Sen. Sanders, per the article, is batting two for six on legislation, but his heart is in the right place. I don't think anyone currently in the running for the D nomination is on the wrong side of these issues, though:

So we know Sanders is dedicated to climate action and clean energy. Looking forward, though, it's unclear how Sanders will differentiate his climate and energy proposals from Clinton's. Clinton, like President Obama, firmly supports regulating carbon emissions domestically and getting strong international agreements to reduce emissions globally. While it is certainly true that Sanders has made more of an issue of his support for the same, it is not necessarily an issue on which Clinton needs to be pushed leftward. Many climate hawks love the fee-and-dividend approach that Sanders supports, but the truth is that no big climate-pricing bill will pass in the next few years, no matter who's president, because the Republicans will continue to control the House. And Clinton already supports the kind of strong executive action that Obama is taking to curb CO2 emissions from power plants.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Bernie Sanders the Bes...»Reply #2