Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Josh Marshall: How Jeb Bush Triggered an Iraq War Watershed [View all]Algernon Moncrieff
(5,961 posts)5. Three thoughts
1) Jeb Bush seems to have a problem that other conservatives have had from time to time: when they are interviewed on FAUX, they seem to forget that their quotes will be heard outside of those friendly confines.
2) Conservatives were mistaken if they had thought that ISIS had shifted American views on justification of the Iraq War.
3) Interestingly, a PPP poll (it was posted in DU, but I don't have a link - sorry) showed the GOP primaries as Walker in 1st, Rubio and Ben Carson 2 & 3, and the Jebster in 4th -- and I think that was taken before these comments came out.
E.T.A. I was wrong - Jeb's polling 5th, but to be fair, the field is very tight.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026668278
Raleigh, N.C. PPP's national Republican poll for May continues to find Scott Walker
leading the field, but it's tightly clustered and his support has actually dropped two
consecutive surveys now. Walker's at 18% to 13% for Marco Rubio, 12% each for Ben
Carson and Mike Huckabee, 11% for Jeb Bush, 10% for Ted Cruz, 9% for Rand Paul, 5%
for Chris Christie, and 2% for Rick Perry.
leading the field, but it's tightly clustered and his support has actually dropped two
consecutive surveys now. Walker's at 18% to 13% for Marco Rubio, 12% each for Ben
Carson and Mike Huckabee, 11% for Jeb Bush, 10% for Ted Cruz, 9% for Rand Paul, 5%
for Chris Christie, and 2% for Rick Perry.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It wasn't 'bad intel' it was deliberately COOKED intel fed to world leaders, congress, media
blm
May 2015
#4
"virtually no one of any consequence standing up for the decision to invade" *** Not True ***
hibbing
May 2015
#9
That criminal cabal is not running for office or having to answer hostile questions.
erronis
May 2015
#16
I still consider Colin Powell, despite all his soft talking, one of the worst
No Vested Interest
May 2015
#22
And yet he supported the invasion of Iraq 2003 and continued to support occupation thru '05
Bucky
May 2015
#23
my aunt happened to see a gnewz scrawl about jeb's jump retreat om iwaq + was confused. did we
pansypoo53219
May 2015
#27
I don't trust them not to repeat their mistakes (or make brand new ones)
Proud Liberal Dem
May 2015
#36