Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The 13 Democrats who just voted to move to debate on trade deal. [View all]GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)61. Yep. She really needs to fucking go.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The 13 Democrats who just voted to move to debate on trade deal. [View all]
madfloridian
May 2015
OP
And yet Jeff Merkley did not vote for it while both of the Washington Senators did and Wyden.
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#106
Ah, the usual suspects. The Third Way/Blue Dog/New Democrat usual suspects.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#2
Actually the two senators from Washington the State don't usually vote with
rhett o rick
May 2015
#30
I thought Sen Cantwell was getting better in the last few years but she does have
rhett o rick
May 2015
#113
"TPA requires the administration make any agreement public for at least 60 days before entering...
Cali_Democrat
May 2015
#11
So they had 10 years to hide everything and we have 60 days to read and research...sounds
haikugal
May 2015
#13
Not to mention that is is a done deal anyway once TPA is in place. That's why they pushed so hard
GoneFishin
May 2015
#62
You're confused. You actually believe that TPA is not the end of the story. After TPA it's a done
GoneFishin
May 2015
#67
Any finalized trade agreement will have to be submitted to Congress for an up-or-down vote. nt
Cali_Democrat
May 2015
#86
So what? We don't have the votes to stop a bad deal even if magically every Democrat held.
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#146
The debate is a show, where is your list of Republicans that are looking out for workers and
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#165
You are exactly right, with some added scariousity, which is that they have had 10 years to play out
GoneFishin
May 2015
#76
So now the complaint, now that the agreement is public as intended, is that it is too long to read?? So much
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#118
No, the complaint is about imposing an artificial deadline on reading and considering it.
Jim Lane
May 2015
#124
The history of fast track should be researched by folks who fail to grasp the "why".
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#129
Which would give Obama what he wants...he can approve it and congress can't change it..
madfloridian
May 2015
#93
If Congress doesn't like the trade agreement, they can reject it outright through an up-or-down vote
Cali_Democrat
May 2015
#105
If the Republicans don't like it (which they do) they can reject it out right
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#149
Why would you force such an issue? Fucking cookoo for Coco Puffs thought process there.
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#177
I'm letting my two senators (Cantwell and Murray) know that their votes decide my vote.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2015
#4
they represent corporate america, not you, so that statement is actually true nt
msongs
May 2015
#16
What a bunch of fools. They don't know what the TPP is about and what it will
JDPriestly
May 2015
#26
"once they established that they could safely take minorities and labor for granted"
madfloridian
May 2015
#172
I do not understand why this is bad, to debate it. I've not been following each little part, please
uppityperson
May 2015
#31
The news is even with 100% solidarity among Democrats (right) we don't have the votes
TheKentuckian
May 2015
#159
There are lots of important issues, and having a democrat in office is important.
Agschmid
May 2015
#94
Much better than republicans because . . . I'm not sure. They seem like a liability to the party
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#97
An eclectic mix, looking out for a trade bill that promises so much to so few.
Octafish
May 2015
#139
From Salon. TPA and secrecy. Only after Obama gets fast track will it be open supposedly.
madfloridian
May 2015
#174
Cantwell and Murray. Damn. That is disappointing. Just what kind of assistance is going to help our
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#183