Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To me, besides the tragic nature of the AMTRAK crash... [View all]haele
(15,292 posts)6. I suspect the train was getting up to the speed it would be at past the curve.
Either the engineer was tired and missed (or wasn't familiar with or forgot about) the 50mph curve at that spot, or there was an issue with the train's mechanisms and it started accelerating on its own.
Haele
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
honestly, I think the model is Soviet Union. One party rule by brute force.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#40
It derailed because it was going 100 mph in a place meant to tolerate 50 mph speeds.
uppityperson
May 2015
#2
I agree that Amtrak's rails are not good enough, was trying to note that the problem wasn't
uppityperson
May 2015
#11
that's what I wonder. Physics says doing curves at certain speeds just inherently risky.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#37
The wreck in Italy near Naples several years ago: excessive speed. THIS wreck also was
FailureToCommunicate
May 2015
#22