Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
2. I'm fine with the concept, but this kind of fantasy CBA always irks me
Fri May 15, 2015, 09:56 AM
May 2015

The "170K per prisoner" averages all costs of the prison system, from buildings to utilities to admin and everything else, divided by the number of prisoner days. Having 1 prisoner less saves you essentially zero (they are hardly likely to vary industrial level food orders based on individual head count, although significant shifts may eventually affect that first). No less to light, heat, etc. No fewer guards, janitors, accountants, etc. Reducing prisoners below a level which would allow them to, say, close a facility or at least a block or wing entirely would actually put the cost per prisoner UP as you would be using a smaller denominator for the same fixed costs. It certainly wouldn't save "big bucks" for anybody.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Four Ways Cities Can Make...»Reply #2