Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
34. "Canada's Department of Finance could not point to a specific provision of NAFTA that the Volcker
Fri May 15, 2015, 02:29 PM
May 2015

might violate."

(Canada's Finance Minister Joe) Oliver’s comments, however, are the first to link the Volcker rule directly to NAFTA, which covers trade between Canada, Mexico and the U.S. Free trade agreements like NAFTA and the TPP include dispute-settlement provisions that allow partner nations -- and corporations -- to bring challenges to domestic policy.

But the slim chances of winning a claim against the U.S. suggest that Oliver's provocations might be more political than pragmatic. "The idea that Dodd-Frank’s going to be repealed or even modified because of trade agreements is kind of far-fetched," Lester says. "But even a challenge makes headlines."

Reached for comment, Canada's Department of Finance could not point to a specific provision of NAFTA that the Volcker rule might violate. The agency declined to comment further on Oliver's remarks.

Negotiations over a concurrent trade deal with European partners have foundered over similar concerns, as member countries debate the inclusion of financial services policies. Ironically, it’s the Obama administration that has thrown up roadblocks over that deal, arguing that its banking provisions clash with American financial reforms.

http://www.ibtimes.com/trans-pacific-partnership-canadian-officials-salvo-against-key-dodd-frank-provision-1922574

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have the feeling that corporations are poised and ready like vultures, everything in readiness, djean111 May 2015 #1
I have the feeling that corporations are poised and ready like vultures, everything in readiness, The CCC May 2015 #15
Yes. They won't move too soon, but they will when they get the deals JDPriestly May 2015 #19
It's all in the timing, isn't it? hedda_foil May 2015 #2
actually, they got it from the Wall St Journal magical thyme May 2015 #9
Hold it ... Their OWN money??!! staggerleem May 2015 #17
And now what? Helen Borg May 2015 #30
now we get to see how ISDS, under NAFTA (and eventually TPP), doesn't require us to change any laws magical thyme May 2015 #32
You make it sound like it's a scam! Helen Borg May 2015 #33
K&R..... daleanime May 2015 #3
After 3000 troops were killed and three trillion dollars spent.... raindaddy May 2015 #4
It really is unwise to challenge Elizabeth Warren on her "home court", as it were. bullwinkle428 May 2015 #5
Good point! JDPriestly May 2015 #20
So where is the part about Canada using TPP to challenge Volker rule? And Naked Capitalism, really? okaawhatever May 2015 #6
That's all you've got, really? marmar May 2015 #7
Again, where is the proof that Canada is using TPP to challenge the Volker Rule? It's in the headlin okaawhatever May 2015 #8
here's a link to the Wall Street Journal magical thyme May 2015 #10
Thanks for that. It seems Canada is just threatening right now. okaawhatever May 2015 #13
one fundamental problem with ISDS is threats magical thyme May 2015 #14
That much is true--look at the Australian tobacco case and how it's intimidating geek tragedy May 2015 #16
It is called intimidation. JDPriestly May 2015 #21
If you have a criticism about Naked Capitalism, why don't you speak out? Really? nm rhett o rick May 2015 #28
CBC News, posted May 13, 2015 @ 11:21 am EST- nenagh May 2015 #11
... and they KILLED IT! (for now, at least) /nt staggerleem May 2015 #18
Just hoping that because the Canadian Finance minister referenced NAFTA... nenagh May 2015 #26
Actually, not true. geek tragedy May 2015 #12
It's this kind of settlement of a potential dispute that could harm the environment, JDPriestly May 2015 #22
thing is, the Canadians kind of have a point. geek tragedy May 2015 #23
Relatively minor? That's what they said about the WTO's general trade agreements of 1997 fasttense May 2015 #24
Nader's outfit is misstating that, badly geek tragedy May 2015 #25
The WTO agreement was signed before Gramm Leach fasttense May 2015 #27
People wake up, you've got to eat your peas! Enthusiast May 2015 #29
We will come to regret this TPP and the Obama presidency so badly. Enthusiast May 2015 #31
"Canada's Department of Finance could not point to a specific provision of NAFTA that the Volcker pampango May 2015 #34
Highly recommend. +1. Jefferson23 May 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren’s Trade ...»Reply #34