Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To me, besides the tragic nature of the AMTRAK crash... [View all]philosslayer
(3,076 posts)36. Positive Train Control WAS in place.
Both on the tracks and on the train. However, it wasn't turned on.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/05/14/exclusive-train-control-was-installed-turned-off-at-time-of-amtrak-crash-congressmen-say
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
honestly, I think the model is Soviet Union. One party rule by brute force.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#40
It derailed because it was going 100 mph in a place meant to tolerate 50 mph speeds.
uppityperson
May 2015
#2
I agree that Amtrak's rails are not good enough, was trying to note that the problem wasn't
uppityperson
May 2015
#11
that's what I wonder. Physics says doing curves at certain speeds just inherently risky.
KittyWampus
May 2015
#37
The wreck in Italy near Naples several years ago: excessive speed. THIS wreck also was
FailureToCommunicate
May 2015
#22