Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
11. Nope, I'm just saying get rid of de facto leases.
Fri May 15, 2015, 03:31 PM
May 2015

Technically it's not privately controlled as the FCC retains all rights, but the way the leases work create a clusterfuck of paperwork. Odds are they were doing everything they could to get the spectrum.

You blame the red tape, I blame the way leases are handled. If there's an important public safety concern, the FCC should've been able to simply override any spectrum lease on a fast track. It can't be that the private spectrum owners wanted to get as much out of the transfer as they possibly could and fought tooth and nail for spectrum that was obviously a public safety concern.

It's not so much red tape in that the FCCs hands were and are tied by these lease arrangements.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Speed Control Was Install...»Reply #11