Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

csziggy

(34,189 posts)
45. A Florida hospital blocked a lesbian from seeing her dying partner
Wed May 9, 2012, 09:34 PM
May 2012
Janice K. Langbehn (born September 22, 1968) is a gay American activist and social worker, who became an activist as a result of the events surrounding the death of her partner, Lisa Marie Pond (October 8, 1967 − February 19, 2007).
Janice K. Langbehn

In February 2007, Langbehn and Pond, along with three of their four children, were in Miami, FL to depart on a cruise. Pond collapsed before the cruise departed and was rushed to Jackson Memorial Hospital's (JMH) Ryder Trauma Center. When Langbehn and their children arrived, a JMH social worker told Langbehn she was in an “anti-gay city and state” and required a health care proxy to see Pond. Langbehn had a power of attorney (POA) which was faxed to the hospital within an hour of Pond’s arrival. However, Langbehn and their 3 young children were kept from Pond’s side for eight hours. Pond slipped into a coma from a brain aneurysm and died without her partner of 18 years or her children by her side.

<SNIP>

Langbehn continued to speak on the topic of hospital visitation and equality for all Americans. Langbehn spoke publicly about her partner's death for the first time at an Olympia, WA Pride gathering on June 18, 2007, just four months after Pond’s death. Langbehn continued to speak out, despite the outcome of her lawsuit. Langbehn’s perseverance caught the attention of the New York Times writer Tara Parker-Pope.[5] As a result of the article, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel brought the article to the attention of President Barack Obama. On April 15, 2010, President Obama called Langbehn from Air Force One to apologize for the treatment her family received at Jackson Memorial Hospital and to inform her about the Presidential Memorandum he signed earlier that day. President Obama’s Memorandum[6] directed the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius to create a rule allowing hospital visitations for same-sex couples comparable to those of married and opposite sex couples. Following Langbehn’s phone call with President Obama, she spoke live to CNN news anchor Anderson Cooper on the show Anderson Cooper 360°.[7]

On June 22, 2010, Langbehn and her three children met with Secretary Sebelius and then attended a gay pride reception at the White House. Prior to the reception, President Obama met with Langbehn and the children to again offer his apology. While speaking at the reception, President Obama described the struggles the Langbehn-Pond family faced and the impact of his memorandum. The President said, "Just a few moments ago, I met with Janice Langbehn and her children... And when Janice's partner of 18 years, Lisa, suddenly collapsed because of an aneurysm, Janice and the couple's three kids were denied the chance to comfort their partner and their mom -- barred from Lisa's bedside. It was wrong. It was cruel. And in part because of their story, I instructed my Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, to make sure that any hospital that's participating in Medicare or Medicaid -- that means most hospitals -- (laughter) -- allow gay and lesbian partners the same privileges and visitation rights as straight partners”.

More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janice_Langbehn

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

. riderinthestorm May 2012 #1
1+ Neoma May 2012 #35
Isn't ironic that states have reciprocal gun laws, but Fawke Em May 2012 #2
Marriage isn't enshrined in an Amendment. Orsino May 2012 #13
Marriage isn't enshrined in an Amendment. AlbertCat May 2012 #16
Your civil rights in respect of firearms are enshrined in the US Constitution badtoworse May 2012 #21
Your civil rights in respect of firearms are enshrined in the US Constitution AlbertCat May 2012 #28
That is your argument, and a rather weak one at that. badtoworse May 2012 #42
"Just because they don't want the definition changed." nomorenomore08 May 2012 #68
It's an analysis of why a 1st Amendment argument is a weak one. badtoworse May 2012 #73
Okay, fair enough. Maybe I did jump to conclusions a bit. nomorenomore08 May 2012 #77
Your "civil right" to join a state-sponsored militia - what we today call the National Guard - is apocalypsehow May 2012 #38
You are wrong on both points badtoworse May 2012 #39
I am correct on both points. (1) *Loving v. Virginia* is the USSC case pertinent to the constitution apocalypsehow May 2012 #50
I would oppose any SCOTUS nominee that would overturn Heller. badtoworse May 2012 #53
Then you oppose the Democratic nominees last two progressive USSC justices, and will oppose any apocalypsehow May 2012 #54
The national guard is not a militia. discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #55
In the current context of the 2nd amendment, the National Guard of 2012 IS the 18th century apocalypsehow May 2012 #56
Eminently tolerant of you. discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #60
Yep: I'm not "tolerant" of GOP/NRA talking points, or debating those who spew them. apocalypsehow May 2012 #64
"Spew off, then." discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #67
There is only one context for our cvil rights and that is the one the framers intended. badtoworse May 2012 #61
You go "educate" someone else with the NRA talking points and dodges. There is no "civil right" to apocalypsehow May 2012 #63
wow, on this board we discuss and debate, and we respect others opinions. crazyjoe May 2012 #74
Not quite: this is a progressive discussion board, and genuine progressives among us don't "respect" apocalypsehow May 2012 #75
Why should I have to choose between a progressive agenda and my 2nd Amendment rights? badtoworse May 2012 #57
Putting aside your mistaken interpretation of the 2nd amendment for the moment, the answer is simply apocalypsehow May 2012 #59
The right to an effective self-defense is right wing? Who knew! badtoworse May 2012 #62
Peddling nonsense about there being a "civil right" to own a gun is right wing: yep. And, of course, apocalypsehow May 2012 #65
"I think we're done here" - Good. We'll see how long it lasts. n/t. apocalypsehow May 2012 #66
Because you disagree... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #69
Reciprocal gun laws aren't part of the Second Amendment obamanut2012 May 2012 #44
You are correct about reciprocal gun laws badtoworse May 2012 #46
One more progressive Justice on the court, and Heller is GONE. That will happen in a second Obama apocalypsehow May 2012 #51
You've never heard of the 14th Amendment? baldguy May 2012 #43
The NRA spends big $$$ for those reciprocal laws... radhika May 2012 #14
Sad that America values the rights of gun nuts over couples who want to get married. madinmaryland May 2012 #71
a day in our lives. folks just don't know what it's like with us. nt xchrom May 2012 #3
I live in a state which had done what NC did yesterday SoutherDem May 2012 #4
It's happened already gaspee May 2012 #5
They will have hell to pay if they cross MOM HockeyMom May 2012 #27
Just posted in another thread about this. blueamy66 May 2012 #6
Do not vacation in those states malaise May 2012 #7
and make sure u contact the local chamber of commerce to let them know why you're going elsewhere. crazylikafox May 2012 #34
Simple answer. YellowRubberDuckie May 2012 #8
Not so simple. Duncan Grant May 2012 #9
That's when you go to a judge. YellowRubberDuckie May 2012 #10
A judge can't help you if the discrimination has been written into law. Duncan Grant May 2012 #19
If you have been given power of attorney by the person in question... YellowRubberDuckie May 2012 #30
An increasing number of anti-equality states have rules to prevent that. LeftyMom May 2012 #70
Thank you, HockeyMom. Zorra May 2012 #11
Very good points. MineralMan May 2012 #12
Michigan banned it a few years ago. Kaleva May 2012 #15
I've got a question then..... rbixby May 2012 #17
There's Article IV: Section 1. bornskeptic May 2012 #22
These laws need to be challengated on the basis of that HockeyMom May 2012 #24
I don't know why full faith and credit doesn't apply here. Manifestor_of_Light May 2012 #37
I've always wondered the same. n/t tammywammy May 2012 #40
Not in all cases Kaleva May 2012 #41
This seems like something the court needs to clear up rbixby May 2012 #48
Wow. BlancheSplanchnik May 2012 #18
What drives me crazy about that is that, as a liberalhistorian May 2012 #31
Vacation in Delaware - we have lovely beaches here LynneSin May 2012 #20
better to vacation in Vermont cali May 2012 #23
my favorite Vermont event druidity33 May 2012 #25
It's a great event cali May 2012 #33
Oh, I LOVE Vermont HockeyMom May 2012 #26
I am in love with this lake! Marrah_G May 2012 #29
South Beach, Lake Willoughby. Fantastic spot cali May 2012 #32
omg I had no idea about the clothing optional beach! Marrah_G May 2012 #36
What is the name of the campground? mumma1010 May 2012 #78
I have no idea what the name of it is. Marrah_G May 2012 #79
A Florida hospital blocked a lesbian from seeing her dying partner csziggy May 2012 #45
k&r, homophobes sure get their jollies in some pretty strange ways ck4829 May 2012 #47
K&R myrna minx May 2012 #49
How about durable power of attorney for health care? sylvi May 2012 #52
Those aren't full-proof either. Lars39 May 2012 #80
If the state in which you live recognizes your marriage... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #58
Yet straight marriages are recognized, no questions asked. alarimer May 2012 #72
The Constitution-lovers have a serious problem with gay marriage jmowreader May 2012 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You are a married gay cou...»Reply #45