Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sen. Sanders' "Too Big To Fail" Bill Isn't a Serious Proposal [View all]Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)52. "You are not focused on the issues."
That's a crock!
Sheshe has been much more focused on many more of the important issues than many other DU members here have been, especially the ones who complain about the BOG regularly in any thread they post in!
The sad fact is, not everyone agrees with you about what issues should be focused on.
But, feel free to post about those issues that mean something to you.
But, you should avoid denigrating those issues others choose to focus on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
phew. got away with being nasty towards fellow posters. i bet you do feel special.
seabeyond
May 2015
#67
the sentiment in the Op is nasty, talking politics, so you can call people names?
seabeyond
May 2015
#70
btw, i am a calif living in texas. big difference. calling me a texan is fightin' words. at the
seabeyond
May 2015
#72
Glad to see you finally over it. It was all pretty damn silly now, wasn't it?
seabeyond
May 2015
#83
Wait, you have an issue me calling you woman. Yet you make excuse name calling and ridiculing people
seabeyond
May 2015
#84
I have issues with a Democratic president trying to ram through a shitty trade deal...
SMC22307
May 2015
#85
silly woman. woman, is not an insult. geez. lol. you do not get the whole feminist thing, do you?
seabeyond
May 2015
#90
no. i would not be apoplectic being called a woman. and ya. i would feel pretty damn silly being
seabeyond
May 2015
#93
Can't wait to hear Hillary's "serious proposal" for dealing with these banks... Lol.
whatchamacallit
May 2015
#2
I got a candid shot of Owly & Wormy on their way to the Sanders Socialist Cell Meeting.
Jackpine Radical
May 2015
#29
"And so, of course, a certain group of liberals are all a-flutter."
woo me with science
May 2015
#17
I do. Because his blue links leads to content. Not another blue link that leads
Luminous Animal
May 2015
#45
DLC/3rdWay is same thing to Democrats as TeaParty is to Republicans, AstroTurf.
Dont call me Shirley
May 2015
#66
Unrec for a poor cut and paste job on an original op-ed piece. You should delete and
KingCharlemagne
May 2015
#22
I don't know why people think the opinion of some blogger is definitive of anything.
Comrade Grumpy
May 2015
#24
It's sensible and reasonable. But yes, sell-out corporate frauds mean it's got no real chance.
Marr
May 2015
#31
Her stand on the banks? I'm waiting for her to speak to her top fundraisers and then
Autumn
May 2015
#56
She is so opposed to it that she's using TWO Super PACs to become elected so that she can fight it.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#99
It helps open a debate and gives politicians a chance to take a side, if they care to. nt
Cheese Sandwich
May 2015
#35
When I first read a post on this bill, I thought it was old story brought up for attention.
freshwest
May 2015
#50
It's called posturing. Getting out ahead of the opponent trying to win hearts and minds of voters.
Major Hogwash
May 2015
#101