Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

agentS

(1,325 posts)

7. I was reading about this at the Daily Caller. The commenters there are full of it.

Reply to maxrandb (Original post)

Wed May 9, 2012, 10:28 PM

May 2012

Nowhere in the memo does it say anything about the general being 100% responsible for the operation. In fact, it specificially states that in case of additional risks, the president should be notified. I guess by additional risks, the president could have meant intervention by the ISI or Pakistani Taliban.

The former Attorney General and the conservative movement has reading comprehension problems. They're like turds in the toilet- full of shit!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Swiftboating begins... [View all] maxrandb May 2012 OP

But of course our liberal media would refute the claim, right? Right? BlueCaliDem May 2012 #1

Got to love those "patriotic" Freakers maxrandb May 2012 #2

And they'll spend the next 4 months screaming... louis-t May 2012 #3

Somehow maxrandb May 2012 #6

Yawn get the red out May 2012 #4

Why would I believe anything said by a Bush AG? sinkingfeeling May 2012 #5

I was reading about this at the Daily Caller. The commenters there are full of it. agentS May 2012 #7