General Discussion

rickford66

(6,055 posts)

10. Nope. It was the Doles

Sat May 16, 2015, 12:39 PM

May 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/31/us/doles-share-top-billing-in-california-fund-event.html

"For the Doles, it was their first major joint campaign appearance since Mrs. Dole quit her job as Secretary of Transportation last month to work full time in her husband's campaign. Mrs. Dole, who is from North Carolina, plans to campaign separately, mostly in the South, for her husband. 'Two for the Price of One' "

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

From "Two for the price of one" to how dare you bring Bill Clinton into any discussion [View all] cali May 2015 OP

Does anyone believe that the First Gentleman will don an apron, stay home, and bake cookies? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #1

I don't think any first ladies have done that in decades,if ever. nt sufrommich May 2015 #2

Nor, do I think Bill will be only the "First Gentleman" in a similar capacity. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #18

Is that what you believe a woman's role is? DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #7

Is that what Hillary's role was? Or, did she involve herself in his duties? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #17

MR CLINTON SHOULD NOT HAVE TO STAY HOME AND BAKE COOKIES. trueblue2007 May 2015 #35

I believe this is a minority opinion among Clinton supporters. tritsofme May 2015 #3

fair enough- more than fair enough. cali May 2015 #4

" but minority or not, it's a very vocal contingent." MoonRiver May 2015 #13

Except he also funded right wing death squads in Colombia Oilwellian May 2015 #34

I think the "Two for the price of one" originally was about Mr & Mrs Bob Dole rickford66 May 2015 #5

Nope. It was Bill Clinton, in 1992. DavidDvorkin May 2015 #6

Nope. It was the Doles rickford66 May 2015 #10

Well, I'll be ding-donged! DavidDvorkin May 2015 #12

Bullshit. Context is everything... cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #28

Did you read my original post? rickford66 May 2015 #32

Then pretending Hillary has no WH experience is ridiculous. Either BreakfastClub May 2015 #8

+1. Welcome to DU YoungDemCA May 2015 #11

Seems that proponents want to have it both ways, if there is blame it is an orphan but want credit. TheKentuckian May 2015 #14

absolutely- I wouldn't go so far as to call it a "co-presidency" but cali May 2015 #23

If you support HRC you might be a democrat Exultant Democracy May 2015 #9

Funny how that logic never seems to apply to the Kennedy family. NuclearDem May 2015 #16

A couple of assassins seem to disagree Exultant Democracy May 2015 #21

Nice stunt. R B Garr May 2015 #15

What I find strange is that after the last 2 or 3 decades of failure zeemike May 2015 #19

He had a successful administration, bringing us out of the dumps that a Bush had put us in. pnwmom May 2015 #20

Hell, her active role in the previous Clinton Administrations... Orsino May 2015 #22

then that's what you should be doing, because on several issues cali May 2015 #24

I think these things indicate typical flip-flopping/evolution, rather than running from her record. Orsino May 2015 #33

as an accomplished woman that is accredit with her own experience, i hope clinton stands firm. seabeyond May 2015 #25

oh brother Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #26

Seriously! Buzz Clik May 2015 #30

As long as it's not the Monica and other women stuff treestar May 2015 #27

-1 Buzz Clik May 2015 #29

This exchange led to this OP Cali_Democrat May 2015 #36

Thanks. I was suspicious of this, but not interested enough to search it out. Buzz Clik May 2015 #37

I'm glad she was involved during Bill's presidency. MoonRiver May 2015 #31

No, the issue is you trying to make some statement Hillary made while her HUSBAND was POTUS KittyWampus May 2015 #38

The post right about yours - 31 - says her co-presidency in the 90" s IS important Doctor_J May 2015 #39

Regardless of what the thought police here want, it WILL be part of the discussion carolinayellowdog May 2015 #40

Since women has been in the working place for over 70 years it would seem some of this Thinkingabout May 2015 #41