Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please list the exact changes you want to see. nt DURHAM D May 2015 #1
Why? I'm discussing damaging legislation that HRC supported, and cali May 2015 #2
Not a gotcha game - just a question addressed to you. DURHAM D May 2015 #6
The effects of that "reform" are not tripe. They were very real. I was a single mother with three jwirr May 2015 #29
In no way did I suggest that welfare reform was tripe. nt DURHAM D May 2015 #39
That is what I heard you saying in post #6. jwirr May 2015 #47
Nope. nt DURHAM D May 2015 #53
Since Cali's OP is about welfare reform Oilwellian May 2015 #56
See post #6 and yes you did. Exilednight May 2015 #60
So clearly you would like the law changed... Cali_Democrat May 2015 #8
refer to the post downthread. that poster expressed quite well cali May 2015 #12
Another day.. another BS Clinton attack Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #3
valid discussion of issues and candidates. cali May 2015 #5
Stop Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #23
Blind obedience is not a progressive quality. Scuba May 2015 #57
Right back atcha Evergreen Emerald May 2015 #61
Training those for jobs who are down on their luck is helping. Thinkingabout May 2015 #4
yeah, I see you addressed the facts in the article. NOT. cali May 2015 #9
You are talking about welfare reform. Two years of job training and assistance Thinkingabout May 2015 #13
Jaysus. it's hopeless. bye bye. You just don't have enough cali May 2015 #17
Maybe you should research before accusing someone of not having Thinkingabout May 2015 #26
Apparently you don't have enough knowledge of Hillary's legislative record KittyWampus May 2015 #27
The post spoke about BC in 1996, this is what I was posting in response. Thinkingabout May 2015 #38
We had access to job training before the "reform". What the "reform" did not address was those jwirr May 2015 #35
Welfare reform will not work for everyone especially the disabled. Thinkingabout May 2015 #40
I got my education BEFORE the reform. And the problem with it was that it did not address those jwirr May 2015 #49
I am sorry for your difficulties. I know and understand not everyone is Thinkingabout May 2015 #54
I totally agree with you on this. Training programs are very valuable. My own education was not jwirr May 2015 #55
I'd like to see daredtowork May 2015 #7
Thank you. That is exactly what should happen now. jwirr May 2015 #37
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba May 2015 #59
I imagine she'll do as she has in the past, tweet something that sounds like she cares... NYC_SKP May 2015 #10
Here is an example BainsBane May 2015 #11
I knew you'd leap at that. I almost left it off because of that. cali May 2015 #15
I think she will change her position BainsBane May 2015 #28
Oh, she'll change her stated position all right. Empty rhetoric is her forte. Scuba May 2015 #58
That's incredibly sexist language DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #18
That's why it's used BainsBane May 2015 #34
When Goldman tells her what to think, hifiguy May 2015 #14
Hillary Clinton opposed welfare reform DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #16
so she defended it and praised it in 2008 because of... cali May 2015 #19
Sexist bullshit. Her HUSBAND passed legislation. I don't like Hillary but this shows how KittyWampus May 2015 #20
Sorry, no. fail. Sexism? what crap. cali May 2015 #22
Totally sexist. SHE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. She has a record as Senator- KittyWampus May 2015 #25
FLAT OUT FALSE cali May 2015 #44
Mea Culpa. She supported the same position as Barack Obama DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #21
Wonder what he meant by that? jwirr May 2015 #42
Maybe because it perpetuates negative stereotypes of certain groups being dependent and lazy ... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #46
Okay that sounds reasonable. Thanks. jwirr May 2015 #50
You can find her positions on welfare reform KMOD May 2015 #24
Yes, Hillary has been a long time advocate for children, she has also advocated for women and their Thinkingabout May 2015 #33
How many people you know part of an administration are going to voice an opposite view point in still_one May 2015 #30
Good post Thinkingabout May 2015 #36
Eleanor went against Franklin's policy all the tine upaloopa May 2015 #43
Point is not many still_one May 2015 #45
It would have been hard for HRC to resign as First Lady./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #48
The media would have loved it still_one May 2015 #52
Maybe she can fly them to Malaysia to work TBF May 2015 #31
K&R..... daleanime May 2015 #32
Hillary is not Bill Clinton nt upaloopa May 2015 #41
Has she bought a newer and more efficient waffle iron? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton Wants to Help Fam...»Reply #39