Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jwirr

(39,215 posts)

5. You are somewhat right. To me the economy means my children, grandchildren and great

Reply to SMC22307 (Reply #2)

Sat May 16, 2015, 05:00 PM

May 2015

grandchildren. And what is threatening them right now is the economic impact on low income workers. I am also concerned about women's issues because the young ladies in my family are going to need protection. But if the bottom falls further for low income families they are also going to need economic protection.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

To anger female voters in America is to tread on the tiger's tail... [View all] Playinghardball May 2015 OP

Problem is..... daleanime May 2015 #1

"The War on Women" didn't propel Udall or Hagan to victory. SMC22307 May 2015 #2

You are somewhat right. To me the economy means my children, grandchildren and great jwirr May 2015 #5

does not seem to be stopping, or hindering in any way, those woman-hating pols who are niyad May 2015 #3

wishful thinking. drray23 May 2015 #4

That enough women are not that angry is to me ... ananda May 2015 #6