Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Marijuana Prohibition Is Unscientific, Unconstitutional And Unjust [View all]
By Jacob Sullum
Next Thursday I am scheduled to debate Robert White, co-author (with Bill Bennett) of Going to Pot: Why the Rush to Legalize Marijuana Is Harming America, on Glenn Becks radio show. Each of us will get half an hour or so to make his case before taking questions from Beck and each other. Here is what I plan to say:
A few days before the House of Representatives passed a federal ban on marijuana in June 1937, the Republican minority leader, Bertrand Snell of New York, confessed, I do not know anything about the bill. The Democratic majority leader, Sam Rayburn of Texas, educated him. It has something to do with something that is called marihuana, Rayburn said. I believe it is a narcotic of some kind.
That exchange gives you a sense of how much thought Congress gave marijuana prohibition before approving it. Legislators who had heard of the plant knew it as the killer weed described by Federal Bureau of Narcotics Commissioner Harry Anslinger, who claimed marijuana turned people into homicidal maniacs and called it the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind. Anslinger warned that marihuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes and estimated that half the violent crimes in areas occupied by Mexicans, Greeks, Turks, Filipinos, Spaniards, Latin Americans, and Negroes may be traced to the use of marihuana.
Given this background, no one should pretend that marijuana prohibition was carefully considered or that it was driven by science, as opposed to ignorance and blind prejudice. It is hard to rationally explain why Congress, less than four years after Americans had emphatically rejected alcohol prohibition, thought it was a good idea to ban a recreational intoxicant that is considerably less dangerous.
It is relatively easy, for example, to die from acute alcohol poisoning, since the ratio of the lethal dose to the dose that gives you a nice buzz is about 10 to 1. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 2,200 Americans die from alcohol overdoses each year. By contrast, there has never been a documented human death from a marijuana overdose. Based on extrapolations from animal studies, the ratio of the drugs lethal dose to its effective dose is something like 40,000 to 1.
Much more and worth the read at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2015/05/14/marijuana-prohibition-is-unscientific-unconstitutional-and-unjust/
27 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My opinion on marijuana would basically be the most restrictive of alcohol and tobacco laws.
DanTex
May 2015
#3
I agree, I think the frequent use by people under 21 is an issue and some studies.....
Logical
May 2015
#8
The only successful way of controlling any vice is to put a tax stamp on it
Major Nikon
May 2015
#19
I understood that. I just never want to miss an opportunity to bad mouth Glenn Beck.
Enthusiast
May 2015
#23
I'll bet 5% of Beck's listeners grow in their own or their parent's home. About 25% are users of
jtuck004
May 2015
#10