Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
Sat May 16, 2015, 09:41 PM May 2015

Marijuana Prohibition Is Unscientific, Unconstitutional And Unjust [View all]


By Jacob Sullum

Next Thursday I am scheduled to debate Robert White, co-author (with Bill Bennett) of Going to Pot: Why the Rush to Legalize Marijuana Is Harming America, on Glenn Beck’s radio show. Each of us will get half an hour or so to make his case before taking questions from Beck and each other. Here is what I plan to say:

A few days before the House of Representatives passed a federal ban on marijuana in June 1937, the Republican minority leader, Bertrand Snell of New York, confessed, “I do not know anything about the bill.” The Democratic majority leader, Sam Rayburn of Texas, educated him. “It has something to do with something that is called marihuana,” Rayburn said. “I believe it is a narcotic of some kind.”

That exchange gives you a sense of how much thought Congress gave marijuana prohibition before approving it. Legislators who had heard of the plant knew it as the “killer weed” described by Federal Bureau of Narcotics Commissioner Harry Anslinger, who claimed marijuana turned people into homicidal maniacs and called it “the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind.” Anslinger warned that “marihuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes” and estimated that half the violent crimes in areas occupied by “Mexicans, Greeks, Turks, Filipinos, Spaniards, Latin Americans, and Negroes may be traced to the use of marihuana.”

Given this background, no one should pretend that marijuana prohibition was carefully considered or that it was driven by science, as opposed to ignorance and blind prejudice. It is hard to rationally explain why Congress, less than four years after Americans had emphatically rejected alcohol prohibition, thought it was a good idea to ban a recreational intoxicant that is considerably less dangerous.

It is relatively easy, for example, to die from acute alcohol poisoning, since the ratio of the lethal dose to the dose that gives you a nice buzz is about 10 to 1. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 2,200 Americans die from alcohol overdoses each year. By contrast, there has never been a documented human death from a marijuana overdose. Based on extrapolations from animal studies, the ratio of the drug’s lethal dose to its effective dose is something like 40,000 to 1.


Much more and worth the read at:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2015/05/14/marijuana-prohibition-is-unscientific-unconstitutional-and-unjust/
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is taboo AgingAmerican May 2015 #1
Kick and rec! zappaman May 2015 #2
My opinion on marijuana would basically be the most restrictive of alcohol and tobacco laws. DanTex May 2015 #3
I agree with your laws! I hope we get there some day! nt Logical May 2015 #5
Cannabis has been used as medicine for over 3000 years Tsiyu May 2015 #16
Historical Origination of Cannabis Prohibition RandallBurns May 2015 #4
I agree, I think the frequent use by people under 21 is an issue and some studies..... Logical May 2015 #8
The only successful way of controlling any vice is to put a tax stamp on it Major Nikon May 2015 #19
I agree up to a point Punx May 2015 #11
Great points! nt Logical May 2015 #26
I strongly disagree. F4lconF16 May 2015 #12
Drug testing for marijuana The Wizard May 2015 #14
I can't imagine Glenn Beck’s radio show being entirely fair to Jacob Sullum. Enthusiast May 2015 #6
I agree with you, seems like a terrible place to hold the debate. nt Logical May 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2015 #13
I wouldn't like Glenn Beck if he was a crusader for legal pot and LSD. Enthusiast May 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2015 #21
I understood that. I just never want to miss an opportunity to bad mouth Glenn Beck. Enthusiast May 2015 #23
Among other things Major Nikon May 2015 #20
I believe the latin name for the mystery illness is "Pleni Stercore" Warren DeMontague May 2015 #22
That too Major Nikon May 2015 #25
Focus on the natural right to grow plants. WDIM May 2015 #9
I'll bet 5% of Beck's listeners grow in their own or their parent's home. About 25% are users of jtuck004 May 2015 #10
Tn just legalized CBD oil, but only for epilepsy Tsiyu May 2015 #15
But PHARMA make a fortune on oxy and similar drugs, and the prison industry needs customers Doctor_J May 2015 #18
So true, which kills 1000s of people. nt Logical May 2015 #27
Yeah, its illogical JonLP24 May 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marijuana Prohibition Is ...