Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
12. I strongly disagree.
Sun May 17, 2015, 02:04 AM
May 2015

Drug tests are NOT good enough. They are a racist employment policy that affects huge numbers of people, and is primarily used with the rest of this bullshit War on Drugs to harm low-income and predominately black communities.

They can wreck havoc with people's lives when chemical evidence of cannabis usage can last for months. Case in point: I had one of my summers spent picking up odd jobs, rather than working an okay temp job. Didn't pay nearly as well, and though I'm doing alright, that hurts most people far more.

Don't stand for them. They are every bit part of a system of policies hammering the poor and minorities disproportionately. We can't trade one system of racist policies for another. Pre-employment screening is not good enough.

I don't even know about on-the-job tests. In case of an accident at work and injury to self or others, maybe. But even those I feel like could that could still be used to discriminate. Unfortunately, hate tends to snake into our justice system. Just punish for the crime or violation that occurs and don't give them the tools to discriminate. I say punish, because the problem needs to be solved through an entirely different manner, with available social services and support throughout.

Of course, this ignores the discrimination against the lower-class workers, when in reality upper-class workers, especially the wealthy, kill unconscionable numbers with their policies and decisions. But that's a discussion for another day. I might agree with on the spot checks for high safety risk jobs, but don't know what labor unions think. But another time.

As for the rest of your post:

I somewhat agree about effects of cannabis on younger users. However, cannabis can be used effectively and safely for a wide variety of issues more safely than other medications. We need serious research on this, but that requires federal rescheduling. And in the meantime, I hate to punish any of it, because we know it just hurts communities, and of course it ends up being racist as hell because America.

I also support complete deregulation of the amount of cannabis someone can grow. This cannot be used by the state and corporations to control and profit off of, as they do with the alcohol industry and those laws. And, of course, completely destroys the cartel's trade.

And, of course, the way our entire financial system is aimed entirely against the poor: our insurance system is lawful theft for the most part. I can use responsibly--don't be testing me.

In the meantime, I want to get rid of yet another of the many harmful policies still brought about by our current politicians on both the extreme right and liberal sides of our corrupt justice and political systems.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is taboo AgingAmerican May 2015 #1
Kick and rec! zappaman May 2015 #2
My opinion on marijuana would basically be the most restrictive of alcohol and tobacco laws. DanTex May 2015 #3
I agree with your laws! I hope we get there some day! nt Logical May 2015 #5
Cannabis has been used as medicine for over 3000 years Tsiyu May 2015 #16
Historical Origination of Cannabis Prohibition RandallBurns May 2015 #4
I agree, I think the frequent use by people under 21 is an issue and some studies..... Logical May 2015 #8
The only successful way of controlling any vice is to put a tax stamp on it Major Nikon May 2015 #19
I agree up to a point Punx May 2015 #11
Great points! nt Logical May 2015 #26
I strongly disagree. F4lconF16 May 2015 #12
Drug testing for marijuana The Wizard May 2015 #14
I can't imagine Glenn Beck’s radio show being entirely fair to Jacob Sullum. Enthusiast May 2015 #6
I agree with you, seems like a terrible place to hold the debate. nt Logical May 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2015 #13
I wouldn't like Glenn Beck if he was a crusader for legal pot and LSD. Enthusiast May 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague May 2015 #21
I understood that. I just never want to miss an opportunity to bad mouth Glenn Beck. Enthusiast May 2015 #23
Among other things Major Nikon May 2015 #20
I believe the latin name for the mystery illness is "Pleni Stercore" Warren DeMontague May 2015 #22
That too Major Nikon May 2015 #25
Focus on the natural right to grow plants. WDIM May 2015 #9
I'll bet 5% of Beck's listeners grow in their own or their parent's home. About 25% are users of jtuck004 May 2015 #10
Tn just legalized CBD oil, but only for epilepsy Tsiyu May 2015 #15
But PHARMA make a fortune on oxy and similar drugs, and the prison industry needs customers Doctor_J May 2015 #18
So true, which kills 1000s of people. nt Logical May 2015 #27
Yeah, its illogical JonLP24 May 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marijuana Prohibition Is ...»Reply #12