Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She's a national treasure. (nt) Jackpine Radical May 2015 #1
She sure is. Enthusiast May 2015 #18
Anybody happen to see what I attracted there before it got vanished? Jackpine Radical May 2015 #35
I didn't catch a glimpse. Enthusiast May 2015 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2015 #34
BAM! Segami May 2015 #2
Speaking Truth To Power - Always Effective - Always Welcomed cantbeserious May 2015 #3
K&R CharlotteVale May 2015 #4
Bets? SoapBox May 2015 #5
Oh, yes! Past time to deconstruct (as in a recent book) Ronnie. maddiemom May 2015 #6
Add a couple of presidents for me: Rolando May 2015 #8
Why? What problem do you have with FDR and Truman? I think they were good liberal Democrats. StevieM May 2015 #9
He said Truman and Eisenhower (not FDR) but I agree, Truman was VERY progressive... George II May 2015 #11
He said Truman, Eisenhower and also FDR. StevieM May 2015 #15
Missed that ("couple" threw me off!), skipped right over to Truman and Eisenhower, sorry! George II May 2015 #25
Eisenhower was a Liberal compared to most of today's Democrats. bvar22 May 2015 #32
Seriously? Brewinblue May 2015 #10
Truman and Eisenhower started our obsession with intelligence because it was so helpful JDPriestly May 2015 #27
They are deeply misinformed. Must watch a lot of Lying Fox News. Enthusiast May 2015 #39
I'm puzzled. Harry and Ike were not at all perfect, but...? maddiemom May 2015 #12
Really? daleanime May 2015 #13
Why? jwirr May 2015 #33
And we have lived it for 35 years and continue to live it..... joanbarnes May 2015 #7
+300 million nationalize the fed May 2015 #14
Sigh! I like your Sanders/Warrne signature line. JDPriestly May 2015 #26
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2015 #16
K & R. Tell it Sister Elizabeth! She is a righteous force God knows. Thanks for the post- appalachiablue May 2015 #17
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Enthusiast May 2015 #19
Wasn't she voting for conservatives into the nineties? boston bean May 2015 #20
she still chose to vote for and with con's after Reagan? stonecutter357 May 2015 #21
How do you know who she voted for? JDPriestly May 2015 #23
Who cares? If she did, she learned. If she didn't, she had already learned. JDPriestly May 2015 #24
Then your position is at odds with Warren herself, who states that Reagan's R B Garr May 2015 #29
Wonderful! Wonderful! Wonderful! JDPriestly May 2015 #22
I am damned glad Warren decided not to run. Buzz Clik May 2015 #28
If you "have no idea what the hell she is up to" LiberalLovinLug May 2015 #40
Looks like you need an education in rhetorical comments. You won't be getting it from me. Buzz Clik May 2015 #42
"rhetorical" is not used as a comment but a question FYI LiberalLovinLug May 2015 #43
As I said, your education is incomplete, and it is not my responsibility to correct it. Buzz Clik May 2015 #44
here is a video someone posted from yesterday's speech rurallib May 2015 #30
She is the Real Deal. hifiguy May 2015 #31
Signal, wardrobe blunder, or neither? CA parents wear red and black at all protests against #SB277. proverbialwisdom May 2015 #36
Ditto, Loretta Sanchez, 2 hours ago. proverbialwisdom May 2015 #41
Pictorial uppdate. proverbialwisdom May 2015 #46
My hand kept clicking this over and over... Octafish May 2015 #37
Awesome! blackspade May 2015 #45
K&R woo me with science May 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren: "....»Reply #33