Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: i would +1 this post, but i cannot. Bluenorthwest gave me permission to post this as an OP. [View all]Number23
(24,544 posts)8. This has been shown a million times in a million different ways
It's that simple, and without the minority voters, they don't have a movement...It is white straight progressive populists who need the rest of us.
Every "leftist" agenda that doesn't involve a rock solid, concrete, GENUINE commitment of involving and incorporating the individual and unique struggle of minorities is doomed to fail as has been proven over and over and over and over again.
Every "leftist" agenda that doesn't involve a rock solid, concrete, GENUINE commitment of involving and incorporating the individual and unique struggle of minorities is doomed to fail as has been proven over and over and over and over again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i would +1 this post, but i cannot. Bluenorthwest gave me permission to post this as an OP. [View all]
seabeyond
May 2015
OP
you are not getting this conversation is not about sanders vs clinton. you cannot get off that.
seabeyond
May 2015
#21
people, mostly men, point the finger at radical fems. not an insult. basically,
seabeyond
May 2015
#24
reminds me of the 'virgin, lesbian, slut' version i went thru with one particular man. lol. nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#32
number two. lol lol. hadnt even registered that. you are so fuckin'ly funny. what a hoot.
seabeyond
May 2015
#37
Did my questions scare you? Why can't you stand up and respond? You sure were free with the snark
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#43
They want economic justice first. Then I guess they believe that will trickle down to social justice
seabeyond
May 2015
#17
this is for you. this path has the same feel i experienced the last 3 yrs with the lesbian/black
seabeyond
May 2015
#15
It's very hard to reach people who are determined not to hear you and who will use
stevenleser
May 2015
#11
i see the excitement with sanders. i ponder the illusions. contradictions. the obvious.
seabeyond
May 2015
#13
it is rather rich to see people talking about how the Democratic party has traded economic
geek tragedy
May 2015
#12
a couple threads made me realize yesterday. sj is not conversation for dems, but the nation, firstly
seabeyond
May 2015
#14
yes and no--yes they are both vital but the economic issues are not necessarily intertwined
geek tragedy
May 2015
#23
i find the dynamics fascinating and so doable. i see the strong demand of the economic and
seabeyond
May 2015
#25
for the last decade women say, you take our vote then walk away. with economic populist
seabeyond
May 2015
#44
No offense, seabeyond - love you for what you do here - but I don't get it.
closeupready
May 2015
#47