General Discussion

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)

22. The Examiner is a rw source so it is hard to take them seriously.

Sun May 17, 2015, 09:44 PM

May 2015

As for Warren if she got in the race she would no doubt be formidable but still not the favorite.

But she doesn't want to run.

I noticed that the rw guy this morning on ABC was trying to play up Warren. No doubt this will be a stratergy on their part because in all honesty they are scared shitless of Hillary.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Elizabeth Warren can snatch the candidacy from Hillary" [View all] NYC_SKP May 2015 OP

Ben Ghazi ~ said in my best god father voice... boston bean May 2015 #1

Apropos of what? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #9

If only it could be reduced to a joke. delrem May 2015 #10

What was done to Libya by NATO was to create a hell on earth for a people who lived in sabrina 1 May 2015 #70

***The clip. It is pretty disgusting. Ewwww. NYC_SKP May 2015 #73

Dailykos had it right! pocoloco May 2015 #58

Excellent cartoon. GoneOffShore May 2015 #93

The Examiner sharp_stick May 2015 #2

this is an improvment for this OP dsc May 2015 #31

Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2015 #3

I seem to have upset a member or two. But the message holds true. Voters are a discerning lot. NYC_SKP May 2015 #8

Oh Hell... That's An Hourly Occurence For Me... WillyT May 2015 #13

~~~DU Poll of 796 members, only 9% choose Hillary to 91% Sanders. NYC_SKP May 2015 #18

But her and her supporters expect that money to be a steamroller. zeemike May 2015 #25

Sad, isn't it? They are prepared to let the Citizens United ruling chose their candidate. NYC_SKP May 2015 #27

Aw, c'mon now. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #34

We are Legion! NYC_SKP May 2015 #36

Well, at least nobody can accuse us of pulling the wool over their eyes. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #40

Second worsted, at the very least!. merrily May 2015 #63

Knitpicker. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #84

You've had me in stitches today. merrily May 2015 #85

Wha'd I do? Jackpine Radical May 2015 #86

knitpicker--knit--stitches. Sigh. I guess I didn't spin that yarn very well. merrily May 2015 #89

Aw, you're a true purl, m'dear. Jackpine Radical May 2015 #90

Elegantly done. I'm about to unravel. merrily May 2015 #94

Still early but.... Segami May 2015 #78

I haven't given up hope. Imagine Warren and Sanders running. NYC_SKP May 2015 #79

The examiner.com is not a reputable news site. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #4

also, see this... boston bean May 2015 #6

Truth is truth no matter the source. How about the LA Times? NYC_SKP May 2015 #7

Funny, I didn't see the word Benghazi in tha LA Times article and I saw boston bean May 2015 #11

She won't endorse any candidate until a nominee is chosen, and then she will support the nominee still_one May 2015 #52

There is no truth. It's pure propaganda BainsBane May 2015 #64

And just like that you dismiss Elizabeth Warren's speech to CA Dems. delrem May 2015 #12

The Examiner pays it's bloggers to write sensationalized stories Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #81

Interesting demmiblue May 2015 #15

That is why I criticized the source. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #82

...except for the fact that she doesn't want to. brooklynite May 2015 #5

Holy Cow! Right-wing horseshit right here on DEMOCRATIC Underground! 6000eliot May 2015 #14

+1000! n/t ColesCountyDem May 2015 #53

"If she continues with her messaging" okasha May 2015 #16

Examiner.com is run by a wingnut who wants to be the 'Fox News Of The Internet.' onehandle May 2015 #17

Anything in the article that is wrong? merrily May 2015 #62

There is truth to this, but I'd still support Sanders in the primary. joshcryer May 2015 #19

Yes, indeed! Her's and Bernie's messages and policies are not far apart. NYC_SKP May 2015 #21

Wait... Who are you supporting? onehandle May 2015 #24

I'm supporting any real Democrat willing to run. Warren, Sanders, they both rock. NYC_SKP May 2015 #30

Not Hillary FTW. onehandle May 2015 #43

Because I want to win in the General Election, I have to prevent Clinton from being the nominee. NYC_SKP May 2015 #44

Then you do Bernie supporters a disservice with that logo. onehandle May 2015 #46

Well I guess I won't be allowed to. joshcryer May 2015 #55

I saw that and I don't know why. NYC_SKP May 2015 #56

Two actually. joshcryer May 2015 #57

This message was self-deleted by its author joshcryer May 2015 #20

The Examiner is a rw source so it is hard to take them seriously. hrmjustin May 2015 #22

It is obvious the RW wants somebody other than Hillary to run. Sure they do not Hillary to run. Thinkingabout May 2015 #29

Warren has charisma. Bernie not so much. redstateblues May 2015 #37

I don't see Sanders as presidential either. hrmjustin May 2015 #41

We should be so lucky. AtomicKitten May 2015 #23

Warren. is. not. running. bvf May 2015 #26

Sanders, very much like Warren, is running, I think, I'm pretty sure. Yeah, he's in. NYC_SKP May 2015 #28

Sanders is in because he said so. bvf May 2015 #33

Because is not is not the same as will not. zeemike May 2015 #38

Uh... bvf May 2015 #47

If only... whatchamacallit May 2015 #32

Everybody loves Elizabeth Warren. KMOD May 2015 #35

Not everybody, but many people....but she'll never run and if she does, she'll never win. George II May 2015 #48

K&R CharlotteVale May 2015 #39

She would not "snatch" it at all. sadoldgirl May 2015 #42

You never know with Elizabeth Warren. JDPriestly May 2015 #51

She actually is from the midwest dreamnightwind May 2015 #74

HUH? How can a person who has proclaimed DOZENS of times she's not running "snatch" the candidacy? George II May 2015 #45

You have to imagine what a thrill it is to be sitting in the audience of a California Democratic JDPriestly May 2015 #49

Thanks! I can't wait for my delegate friend, Tom, to report back. NYC_SKP May 2015 #50

. MohRokTah May 2015 #54

the examiner..... quickesst May 2015 #59

I don't think there was any good reason to post this thread. blue neen May 2015 #60

No right wing source goes unturned BainsBane May 2015 #61

Beautifully stated. blue neen May 2015 #67

Survey says.... merrily May 2015 #65

If the primaries were over, the alerting member might have had a point. NYC_SKP May 2015 #66

The source may well have had its mind in the gutter, but using the same merrily May 2015 #69

If I had been on the jury I would have voted to hide! B Calm May 2015 #92

Clap for Tinkerbell!! Clap as hard as you can!!... SidDithers May 2015 #68

'kay AtomicKitten May 2015 #71

Ha! Last time I wished this hard I got a Black President named Hussein Obama! NYC_SKP May 2015 #72

I want to watch whatever they're watching! merrily May 2015 #76

Sanders is the progressive alternative to Clinton. Not Warren. nt geek tragedy May 2015 #75

Then let us shift our support to Sanders. I will start with a sigline shift and reTweet: NYC_SKP May 2015 #88

Would LOVE to cast my vote for Warren, but, always watchful not to buy in blm May 2015 #77

The point of the OP isn't Warren. It's that Hillary's progressive credentials are thin. NYC_SKP May 2015 #80

You should know me by now - I've focused on RW propaganda machine since the 90s. blm May 2015 #83

I want Warren to run too... kenfrequed May 2015 #87

I thought the Benghazi and e-mail scandals are made up republican talking points! B Calm May 2015 #91