Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How the Media Misrepresent Obama’s “Fast Track” “Secret” International Trade Deals [View all]djean111
(14,255 posts)1. This cannot be said enough - and is contrary to the "oh, this is ALWAYS how this is done" lies -
Only 16 times since Nixon was in the White House has his Fast-Track TPA been applied, and yet hundreds of free-trade agreements have passed Congress without any need for (or application of) Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority during that time. How and why has this been so, and why does the public not know these crucially important things?
TPA, or Fast Track, is the device that is used only when a President wants to ram through Congress a trade-deal that would never be able to pass Congress under the traditional, and fully Constitutional, method, because these are the few trade-deals that have provisions in them that, for the typical member of Congress, would cause him or her to lose the congressional seat if he or she didnt at least try to get the bill amended before it was passed. In other words: only fascistic, or outrageously pro mega-corporate, trade deals, need TPA in order for them to pass Congress. Thats why Nixon initiated TPA. It works as he intended it would.
Fast Track just lets the president ram through corporate deals - this is NOT about countries, it is about corporate rules over countries - and enables Congress to cover its ass at home.
Why not let the few chapters that are actually about trade stand on their own? No, most of the TPP - and TTIP, I believe, judging from the anger in the EU - is about corporate power. It is almost like we are being told that everything - every law, every rule, every regulation - has to do with trade, and, as such, shoud be decided by corporations. That, IMO, is what is being handed to corporations - globally - on a silver platter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How the Media Misrepresent Obama’s “Fast Track” “Secret” International Trade Deals [View all]
RiverLover
May 2015
OP
This cannot be said enough - and is contrary to the "oh, this is ALWAYS how this is done" lies -
djean111
May 2015
#1
Yes, and it's extremely disappointing to see Obama promote this so heavily
Fast Walker 52
May 2015
#23
Another article critical of ISDS, a dispute mechanism in over 2500 trade agreements since 1959.
Hoyt
May 2015
#2
I have found that when people resort to "ooooh", they really have nothing substantive to say.
djean111
May 2015
#4
So many people in Europe have protested the TTIP (50000+), they are having to renegotiate TTIP
RiverLover
May 2015
#11
It gives corporations power over local govts AND not just through the evil ISDS
RiverLover
May 2015
#5
In what alternate reality would ANY fucking "arbitraters" being "chosen" by corporations...
99Forever
May 2015
#21
Just take the mental quantum leap to Ronald Reaganistan. They tell me its nice there. nt
raouldukelives
May 2015
#26
Well without well regulated companies, most of us would be living a Great Depression
Hoyt
May 2015
#29
I'm impressed Bloomberg published this. Thanks for adding it to this thread!
RiverLover
May 2015
#18
I'm sorry, but I can't take global research seriously as they are very creepy about LGBT issues.
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#30