General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Billionaire Gets 4 Months For Sexually Assaulting 12-Year-Old Because He’s ‘Productive [View all]Captain Stern
(2,253 posts)But it could be that the prosecutor didn't think he/she could win a case without the victim's testimony. In that case, the abuser would have walked away with no punishment at all.
My point is that there don't have to be any crooked players in our justice system for it to be unfair. It's definitely better to be a rich defendant, than a non-rich defendant. The abuser could have payed off the victim, the victim's mother (his wife), and/or the victim's biological father to not cooperate with the prosecution. If that were the case, there's nothing the prosecutor or judge could do.
Even if that weren't the case, the resources that the abuser had at his disposal tilt the table in his favor. He can afford to pay superior lawyers to delay the case forever, without suffering any change in lifestyle at all. The rest of us don't have that luxury.