Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: At least 17 years! [View all]

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
373. There are leaders and there are followers
Tue May 19, 2015, 11:44 AM
May 2015

On gay rights it's clear which candidate is the leader, morally ahead of public opinion by a decade or more and which the follower, waiting for the safety of numbers before expressing support.






At least 17 years! [View all] MannyGoldstein May 2015 OP
As a proud gay man I stand with Hillary Clinton! hrmjustin May 2015 #1
17 years. nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #2
I will only vote for a candidate I believe can win. hrmjustin May 2015 #5
Then why support Hillary Clinton? FlatBaroque May 2015 #30
Lol your opinion. My opinion is she is the only Democratic Candidate or possible Democratic hrmjustin May 2015 #34
But she's won many tough fights MannyGoldstein May 2015 #35
She endured Bosnian sniper fire, for starters RufusTFirefly May 2015 #91
I love you. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #96
Just as long as Mrs. Teasdale doesn't find out! RufusTFirefly May 2015 #105
Quit picking on her. She was telling the truth about being under fire in Bosnia Jackpine Radical May 2015 #158
You got those right wing talking points MaggieD May 2015 #370
Busted! You got me! RufusTFirefly May 2015 #375
Haha thread win! whatchamacallit May 2015 #379
There was the Credit Card and small peon bankruptcy legislation. Octafish May 2015 #305
She polls better than any other candidate -- Democrat or Republican. pnwmom May 2015 #49
Lol I wonder if Sanders supporters realize the gop wants him to win. hrmjustin May 2015 #52
The GOP likes him as a spoiler, just as they did Ralph. pnwmom May 2015 #57
Probably not because it would hurt him with some of the purists. hrmjustin May 2015 #63
Ralph? daleanime May 2015 #64
Nader. n/t pnwmom May 2015 #88
It's what I would expect from a republican.... daleanime May 2015 #264
+1 ...and we have a third pary now ...the 1%. L0oniX May 2015 #347
Barry? KMOD May 2015 #253
When Obama first started his campaign for president..... daleanime May 2015 #260
At least Bernie doesn't have the blood of 1,000,000+ Iraqi civilians KingCharlemagne May 2015 #113
True. We can thank Ralph for helping to toss the election to Bush, pnwmom May 2015 #115
Actually you can than Al rpannier May 2015 #148
And yet if 1% of Nader's 95,000 votes in Florida had gone to Gore, pnwmom May 2015 #155
Florida is always the thing that is pointed to rpannier May 2015 #161
It might not be the only reason Gore lost -- but he would have WON if 1% of Nader's voters pnwmom May 2015 #164
It "might" not be the only reason...? FlatBaroque May 2015 #222
It would never have gotten to SCOTUS if 1% of Nader voters picked Gore instead. pnwmom May 2015 #249
You have FlatBaroque May 2015 #262
300,000+ Florida Democrats voted for Bush. SMC22307 May 2015 #307
And each of them was responsible for 1 vote. Nader controlled 95,000 votes in Florida alone, pnwmom May 2015 #310
This is so lame tennstar May 2015 #382
You realize Bush got 10x more votes from registered Democrats than Nader did, right? jeff47 May 2015 #269
Most of them had left the party during the Reagan years. pnwmom May 2015 #314
So now your argument is it didn't matter, but it did matter. jeff47 May 2015 #329
And just mayber... Paka May 2015 #351
And if 0.03% of the 300K Dem voters who voted for Bush in Florida had voted for Gore-- eridani May 2015 #340
HE didn't lose. He won. FlatBaroque May 2015 #254
Nader's 95,000 votes caused the election to be thrown to the SCOTUS. If only a small fraction pnwmom May 2015 #332
This fucking bullshit yet again?! TM99 May 2015 #342
Exactly. Bush actually campaigned on war with Iraq. KMOD May 2015 #208
Bush most definitely did NOT campaign on a war with Iraq. FlatBaroque May 2015 #267
Oh c'mon. I remember the debates quite well. KMOD May 2015 #287
Thanks for the laugh FlatBaroque May 2015 #291
It's mutual, KMOD May 2015 #296
You're not still trotting out that old canard (that Nader was responsible KingCharlemagne May 2015 #330
Ralph Nader ran as an Independent. Please study up before you make silly comparisons. NYC_SKP May 2015 #355
You expect their rhetoric to be different then any other time? Rex May 2015 #362
considering unlike raplh DonCoquixote May 2015 #196
Nope the GOP feels like you do. that he can't win zeemike May 2015 #119
I am a thinking adult thank you very much. hrmjustin May 2015 #122
That is what she is expected to raise and spend. zeemike May 2015 #157
And after 20 years of so called scandal she is on track to be the president of the USA. hrmjustin May 2015 #166
Do they now? zeemike May 2015 #188
How is sanders going to win? hrmjustin May 2015 #189
By getting votes. zeemike May 2015 #204
How are people going to hear about his positions? hrmjustin May 2015 #209
Well they are hearing about them now are they not? zeemike May 2015 #237
The money is needed for comercials and gotv. hrmjustin May 2015 #241
Well I am not trying to convince you zeemike May 2015 #315
And endurance and Hillary has endurance. hrmjustin May 2015 #317
he seems to be getting heard, even while being shut out by the media. From the NY Times: FlatBaroque May 2015 #288
Yet he is still behind in the polls. hrmjustin May 2015 #289
You're right. He should give up now. FlatBaroque May 2015 #292
Lol. hrmjustin May 2015 #293
Sanders will get the Democratic base tiredtoo May 2015 #380
How will he get his message out without big money? hrmjustin May 2015 #381
it is going viral tiredtoo May 2015 #407
Realistic and it won't work. hrmjustin May 2015 #408
Just curious tiredtoo May 2015 #422
Hillary. hrmjustin May 2015 #423
Well I Admire your loyalty tiredtoo May 2015 #424
No i didn't. i liked him but i wanted Hillary. hrmjustin May 2015 #425
Well then tiredtoo May 2015 #426
Thats fine. hrmjustin May 2015 #427
20 years of non-scandals that everyone is sick of. KMOD May 2015 #202
They don't have to buy it. zeemike May 2015 #220
Her campaign is doing just fine. KMOD May 2015 #257
Good he can beat them like a drum too. hootinholler May 2015 #150
How will he beat them if he won't take big money? hrmjustin May 2015 #152
Like. A. Drum. That's how. hootinholler May 2015 #153
Explain that to those of us that need a more detailed answer please. hrmjustin May 2015 #162
Ok, maybe a video will help hootinholler May 2015 #177
You have a lovely night. hrmjustin May 2015 #180
lol FlatBaroque May 2015 #247
I liked the stick work hootinholler May 2015 #336
That should be a stand alone OP in our group. Autumn May 2015 #352
I love Bernie, KMOD May 2015 #263
Maybe it's not the size of the drum FlatBaroque May 2015 #272
We will see. KMOD May 2015 #285
Nope. hootinholler May 2015 #335
What's your fixation on Big Money? frylock May 2015 #409
I am a realist and i think younneed money to get your message out. hrmjustin May 2015 #410
Just like Romney and Fiorina frylock May 2015 #412
Their message sucked. people didn't like it. hrmjustin May 2015 #414
Gee, no shit? frylock May 2015 #417
My point is you need money to get your message out. hrmjustin May 2015 #418
Polls vs. hubris BainsBane May 2015 #76
Her polling is excellent. KMOD May 2015 #250
This is a rightwing talking point, what is it doing on DU? NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #56
. FlatBaroque May 2015 #61
Where did you come from? Renew Deal May 2015 #193
You first FlatBaroque May 2015 #200
Spare me the hugs Renew Deal May 2015 #207
You should be commended for FlatBaroque May 2015 #216
She is a repug wet dream!! pocoloco May 2015 #371
Do you think you control more than one vote? lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #90
No i get no toaster if that is what you mean. hrmjustin May 2015 #94
I don't consider "weathervane" a highly admirable character trait. lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #102
One of my core principles is I will not vote for a candidate for president who is not likely to win. hrmjustin May 2015 #106
That's not principle, that's prognostication. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #109
Call it whatever you will. i am not going to vote for Sanders in a primary. hrmjustin May 2015 #110
"I have voted for Hillary 5 times and will do so again" Caretha May 2015 #132
Lol i could say something here but I won't. hrmjustin May 2015 #138
You said "Those Damn Juries!" Caretha May 2015 #143
Not at all. i love juries. hrmjustin May 2015 #149
Then be more careful Caretha May 2015 #156
Thank you for Illuminating me. hrmjustin May 2015 #167
Ha! zappaman May 2015 #172
Some might say BainsBane May 2015 #278
But a bit repetitive at times. hrmjustin May 2015 #283
Some folks get double justice BainsBane May 2015 #274
Lol. hrmjustin May 2015 #276
Sid??? Caretha May 2015 #203
Are you accusing me of being a sock? hrmjustin May 2015 #206
We are all Sid. KMOD May 2015 #217
This is just too funny. hrmjustin May 2015 #225
Me, too! Me, too! okasha May 2015 #280
Yes. We are KMOD May 2015 #284
LOL Caretha May 2015 #224
I have a fan club? hrmjustin May 2015 #226
Actually Caretha May 2015 #228
Do tell me what skinner says about my being sid. hrmjustin May 2015 #231
Uh... Caretha May 2015 #235
I already know who i am. hrmjustin May 2015 #239
I have a suggestion for you too Caretha May 2015 #248
. hrmjustin May 2015 #251
I'm a fan. KMOD May 2015 #245
Thanks. hrmjustin May 2015 #246
I'm in your fan club! BainsBane May 2015 #319
Thanks. hrmjustin May 2015 #320
I don't see why you waste your time BainsBane May 2015 #322
Well if they respond to me i feel i should respond back but tonight was a lot. hrmjustin May 2015 #325
Look BainsBane May 2015 #328
Sid is in the basement working in the server room. KMOD May 2015 #215
But but but but Caretha May 2015 #218
Your illumination of issues is just fascinating. hrmjustin May 2015 #221
Lol! zappaman May 2015 #333
Your post is funny. KMOD May 2015 #265
So you're not voting. Republicans are picking their candidate with Hillary, much Exilednight May 2015 #100
I am sorry but i am not getting your meaning. hrmjustin May 2015 #101
And what makes you think Sanders is such a loser, vs. the Republicans? Scootaloo May 2015 #123
He will have a hard time getting centrists to vote for him imo. hrmjustin May 2015 #126
Are you claiming that the Republicans play better to centrists than Sanders? Scootaloo May 2015 #133
No i am saying Hillary will. hrmjustin May 2015 #144
No. You're telling me that republicans are too awesome for Sanders to beat. Scootaloo May 2015 #176
Thats crap and you know it. hrmjustin May 2015 #179
No, it's not. it's your argument. Let's take your points Scootaloo May 2015 #198
I don't think they have anything over him. hrmjustin May 2015 #201
They're not especially legitimate concerns Scootaloo May 2015 #230
I think centrists like comprimise. hrmjustin May 2015 #236
Can you see centrist dems jumping for any of those clowns like they did for Bush in '00? Scootaloo May 2015 #252
Well this primary will be a chance to prove he can win. hrmjustin May 2015 #255
Sensible Centrists... always the problem. SMC22307 May 2015 #234
Well you need centrists to win. hrmjustin May 2015 #238
Please explain why Bernie's message doesn't resonate with Centrists. SMC22307 May 2015 #243
Well not a centrist but i think they like compromise. hrmjustin May 2015 #244
Are Centrists principled? Do they stand for anything? SMC22307 May 2015 #297
I am not a centrist so you would have to ask them. hrmjustin May 2015 #300
no, you need independants to win. independants aren't necessarily centrists. frylock May 2015 #256
Some are centrists and yes you do need them. hrmjustin May 2015 #258
Actually, no. Almost none are centrists. jeff47 May 2015 #275
The Sanders needs to prove himself. hrmjustin May 2015 #279
So, time to abandon that argument and throw up another failed argument? jeff47 May 2015 #298
Sorry but Sanders has not been tested by Republicans electorally like he will be in a general. hrmjustin May 2015 #302
Neither has Clinton. So why do you only demand proof from Sanders? (nt) jeff47 May 2015 #311
Hillary has been tested by every Republican mear and is still here. hrmjustin May 2015 #313
Tested how? By losing the 2008 primary? jeff47 May 2015 #331
living in ny i can tell you 2000 was not simple. hrmjustin May 2015 #346
Yes, 2000 was simple. Her Republican opponent was a cakewalk. jeff47 May 2015 #399
Do you live in NY? hrmjustin May 2015 #400
I used to. jeff47 May 2015 #401
Well as someone who was involved in campaigning for hef that year I can tell you it hrmjustin May 2015 #402
Never claimed it was zero work. I claimed it wasn't a difficult challenge. jeff47 May 2015 #403
And i can tell you it was difficult. hrmjustin May 2015 #404
Not only is he a socialist.... PosterChild May 2015 #210
Not only is that a non-sequitor.... Scootaloo May 2015 #233
'tis not.. PosterChild May 2015 #316
That's why I'm supporting Bernie. His chances of winning are imo, far greater than Hillary's. sabrina 1 May 2015 #124
I don't see him winning the centrist vote. hrmjustin May 2015 #127
Then you see the Republican getting the centrist vote? Makes sense, Reagan Democrats and all. /nt Dragonfli May 2015 #194
It is possible he could but the question is if he won't take big money how will he get his message hrmjustin May 2015 #197
We were talking about the centrist vote that you said he could not get, meaning you appear to think Dragonfli May 2015 #211
Don't mistake my meaning. i don't think their message will be stronger but without hrmjustin May 2015 #214
Democrats have lost time and again chasing that mythical centrist vote. frylock May 2015 #259
Clinton and Obama won centrists. hrmjustin May 2015 #261
I believe that you continue to conflate independants with centrists.. frylock May 2015 #268
They define themselves as middle of the roaders.moderstes. hrmjustin May 2015 #270
So that mush in the middle will vote for the Republican? (n/t) SMC22307 May 2015 #308
depends. If he hax enough money to get his message out then he might 7ght. hrmjustin May 2015 #312
Who are these "centrists" and what is it you think they want? Compromise isn't much of an answer TheKentuckian May 2015 #341
I think they want both parties to comprise on legislation on different topics. hrmjustin May 2015 #345
Again, compromise is a tactic to reach an acceptable end, it is not and cannot be an end. TheKentuckian May 2015 #420
I am not advocating for compromise but giving an opinion on what I think centrists want. hrmjustin May 2015 #421
"centrists" are the third party. It's the party of the 1%. It's the party that joins both... L0oniX May 2015 #348
I'm waiting to see a poll that supports that view. KMOD May 2015 #223
So to you, WINNING is EVERYthing? 99th_Monkey May 2015 #389
Yes! If we lose the country goes down with the gop and they replace the aging SC justices hrmjustin May 2015 #390
For now, that is totally irrelevant. 99th_Monkey May 2015 #391
Hint:Primaries are about getting our best candidate. hrmjustin May 2015 #392
Then why settle for 2nd best? 99th_Monkey May 2015 #393
I'm not. She is my first choice. hrmjustin May 2015 #395
OK 99th_Monkey May 2015 #396
. hrmjustin May 2015 #397
Almost 10 years. nt Andy823 May 2015 #147
Sorry Manny MaggieD May 2015 #357
+1,000,000 yeoman6987 May 2015 #60
. hrmjustin May 2015 #66
Justin~ sheshe2 May 2015 #170
Thank you She! hrmjustin May 2015 #173
Well~ sheshe2 May 2015 #183
This is just fine my friend. hrmjustin May 2015 #187
So, are you blown away that Bernie MannyGoldstein May 2015 #277
He hasn't been especially vocal about it MaggieD May 2015 #358
actually he has, but as YOU have noted several times, HRC has a much cali May 2015 #361
Cali, the GLBT community loves HRC MaggieD May 2015 #368
No. hrmjustin May 2015 #372
you got it, right up to the point where he isnt the candidate, if that happens, then I will randys1 May 2015 #3
Wouldn't social progress be a first female president? JaneyVee May 2015 #4
Thread win! hrmjustin May 2015 #6
And the first Jewish President would be chopped liver? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #8
So you're backing Debbie Wasserman Schultz as a two-fer? Jim Lane May 2015 #38
Hmm... MannyGoldstein May 2015 #39
It would be ignorant to TM99 May 2015 #11
It would be more ignorant to choose a lesser qualified candidate because he is a man. Thinkingabout May 2015 #24
17 years! nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #27
It does not make him more qualified. Just being a member of Thinkingabout May 2015 #47
What *does* make Hillary more qualified? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #48
Oh, really, we sure can't say Bernie is even qualified to teach Saddam a lesson. Thinkingabout May 2015 #62
Well he is off the planet. yeoman6987 May 2015 #65
Sanders voted to fund the war. okasha May 2015 #295
Just being first lady and a senator and SoS doesn't make one qualified or not qualified cali May 2015 #363
Either you can look at the record for both or exclude the record for both. Thinkingabout May 2015 #385
She's been a much more vocal advocate MaggieD May 2015 #364
Now you know some do not want to hear these things,huh. Thinkingabout May 2015 #416
Except the man currently running TM99 May 2015 #46
Perhaps in your opinion, in my opinion he does not have the qualifications Thinkingabout May 2015 #51
If we stay on topic with this OP, TM99 May 2015 #69
He is not acceptable on other issues so what does it matter. Thinkingabout May 2015 #111
What other issues is he not acceptable on? TM99 May 2015 #146
Then the only reason you are pushing for Bernie is because hevhas not "evolved" on the LGBT issue, Thinkingabout May 2015 #199
The only reason? Ha! TM99 May 2015 #205
When are you going to evolve on people "evolving"? Thinkingabout May 2015 #213
This is a typical Clinton supporter response. TM99 May 2015 #273
You can't answer, is it because you will never evolve? Talk about evading the question. Thinkingabout May 2015 #318
Real human beings change & grow. TM99 May 2015 #327
I have not seen where you have expressed remorse. Can you accept the fact some have evolved without Thinkingabout May 2015 #413
Done playing your game. TM99 May 2015 #430
I see you think it is a game, perhaps others does not, continual denial does not change the facts. Thinkingabout May 2015 #431
You are the one playing a very sad game. TM99 May 2015 #432
See, you are not pleased with opinions changing, never happy, you should try being happy for a Thinkingabout May 2015 #433
Can you please answer the question? Kermitt Gribble May 2015 #388
I do not agree with the social issues and am apprehensive on his national security for two things Thinkingabout May 2015 #415
NO ONE here is voting for Sanders because he's a man tkmorris May 2015 #82
What? malokvale77 May 2015 #99
omg -- here comes the "you're sexist if you don't vote for Hillary" thematics. nashville_brook May 2015 #175
Don't attempt to rewrite my post, I posted what I posted. Whatever you say is what you say. Thinkingabout May 2015 #195
cough, cough, bullshit cali May 2015 #334
Obama isn't running. Thinkingabout May 2015 #411
It is ignorant to choose a lesser qualified candidate based on their gender or their race. Autumn May 2015 #353
^^^ this ^^^ (nt) malokvale77 May 2015 #89
No more and no less ignorant than choosing a candidate simply because they arrived at a common LanternWaste May 2015 #356
Here is the deal that so many of y'all don't get. TM99 May 2015 #429
Not necessarily. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #12
Would you say the same if it was Carly Fiorina? Bachman? n/t leftstreet May 2015 #15
Being male or female does not qualify one to be president, we have used the male thing on the past Thinkingabout May 2015 #107
I sit home and bake cookies. SMC22307 May 2015 #321
why wouldn't electing the first Jewish President be social progress? cali May 2015 #16
because according to the privilege-o-matic, Jews are MORE privileged than Christians, even. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #26
Good thing I'm tall. JEB May 2015 #55
Oh my god! I am non privileged. Who knew. yeoman6987 May 2015 #70
Keep saying that and maybe Hillary Clinton will convert. n/t cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #130
If she was a "progressive" Caretha May 2015 #137
How do you equate Caretha May 2015 #154
I will stand with Hillary, thank you. leftofcool May 2015 #7
you mean, Sanders supported it when it was unpopular while Hillary waited until cali May 2015 #18
+1. n/t Smarmie Doofus May 2015 #114
If economic equality is achieved social progress will follow tularetom May 2015 #9
Well, in that case, Hillary's your candidate. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #13
I wish you'd tell that to them people at the HRC group tularetom May 2015 #50
Well, you have to understand: Hillary's most Republican-like policies are Economic Maedhros May 2015 #73
It is for HRC supporters only. hrmjustin May 2015 #74
Any attempt by me to intercede with that group MannyGoldstein May 2015 #384
I don't think she's "for" economic equality. Phlem May 2015 #383
Not true ... for the 4,000,000th time ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #67
So true! sheshe2 May 2015 #185
I guess I should have qualified that with ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #232
Complete and utter bullshit. F4lconF16 May 2015 #87
We have had periods of much greater economic equality gollygee May 2015 #266
absolutely. and a man who fought for civil rights for African Americans cali May 2015 #10
I think the idea that the triangulation wing of the Democratic Party is supposed to be BETTER on Warren DeMontague May 2015 #14
Look fella, we have a big tent MannyGoldstein May 2015 #17
I told them to stay off the moors Warren DeMontague May 2015 #23
Yep. HRC vs. Bernie on social/human rights issues is pretty much a push. hifiguy May 2015 #25
I think it's worth noting that only one of them had to "evolve" their position. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #31
Oh, I am very aware of that. hifiguy May 2015 #36
17 years? nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #33
Only if you give equal credit to leading from behind as you do for being well ahead of the curve. TheKentuckian May 2015 #41
I don't but will give her partial credit hifiguy May 2015 #43
I agree 100%, the phrasing kinda gave me a different vibe. TheKentuckian May 2015 #92
Spot on. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #95
Except even that doesn't have a good basis in facts. jeff47 May 2015 #294
Well at the very least Bill Clinton was the doc in the ER when the very sick man miraculously came Warren DeMontague May 2015 #323
Bernie is excellent on both, while Hillary is good on only one. Maedhros May 2015 #19
In the absence of economic progress, social progress is fragile. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #20
They are equally important and hifiguy May 2015 #21
So which one is Hillary apposed to? upaloopa May 2015 #22
Bernie doesn't count the likes of Dimon and Blankfein hifiguy May 2015 #28
They are interdependent... kentuck May 2015 #29
Economic progress IS social progress. -none May 2015 #32
They have to be tackled at the same time, but sadoldgirl May 2015 #37
Manny, Manny, Manny, do you believe that arm growth is as important as leg growth? nt valerief May 2015 #40
I believe in anything that Karl Rove tells me to believe. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #42
You mean Cruel Rogue. nt valerief May 2015 #45
Good for you Manny Andy823 May 2015 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers May 2015 #44
Said the guy that wrote ... then, self-deleted ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #53
That, my friend, is utter bull@#$%. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #58
"You know when I *know* our teenager's up to no good? ..." ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #72
Still got nothin' but innuendo, I see MannyGoldstein May 2015 #75
I can't produce what you self-deleted ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #77
My chicken and watermelon joke? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #80
Will you pull your ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #85
LOL MannyGoldstein May 2015 #86
No ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #93
So pull over then. They take just as dim a view of those who read while driving too. cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #139
No, there's nothing ironic in that he typed MannyGoldstein May 2015 #282
Your mocking POC for being over sensitive about watermelon jokes..... bettyellen May 2015 #142
Here you are ... for the 5th time ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #190
That doesn't even link to a post of mine. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #191
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #227
I used to run from my statements too... LanternWaste May 2015 #359
+1...nt SidDithers May 2015 #71
I love how Bernie has put an end to the argument pnwmom May 2015 #54
He also put an end to the hair thing and the clothing thing, KMOD May 2015 #271
Well, for Clinton. People still attack him for it. (nt) jeff47 May 2015 #301
I don't. KMOD May 2015 #303
Yeah, well where was he in 1997? rug May 2015 #59
I find it interesting that Clinton is particularly popular among the LGBT community BainsBane May 2015 #68
I think she's particularly popular among Democrats in general, and certainly most Democrats Warren DeMontague May 2015 #79
I can think of a few BainsBane May 2015 #84
I think your narrative doesn't really line up with reality, frankly. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #97
Excuse me, but you don't determine my reality BainsBane May 2015 #219
that's right. And you don't determine what I think, either. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #306
I have no interest in changing your head BainsBane May 2015 #324
Meh. I have children. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #326
"You know, somebody is always first," Clinton told NPR's Terry Gross last summer.... SidDithers May 2015 #78
So, basically, "It's OK to think the LGBT community is inferior MannyGoldstein May 2015 #83
So did Sanders think we were inferior before he came out for marriage equality? hrmjustin May 2015 #98
Was Bernie ever against marriage equality? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #104
You said he was for it 17 years correct? hrmjustin May 2015 #112
The earliest record that I know of is voting against DOMA MannyGoldstein May 2015 #116
Ok well if he came out for it 17 years ago or so it has to mean before hand his opinion evolved hrmjustin May 2015 #118
Why? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #121
Are you saying then that he felt it was right but for political reasons kept his mouth shut? hrmjustin May 2015 #125
Ha! zappaman May 2015 #131
. hrmjustin May 2015 #134
Did anyone ask? nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #140
If he was so cocommitted to marriage equality he would not need to be asked! hrmjustin May 2015 #145
Well, can we at agree that at the very worst, Bernie was probably MannyGoldstein May 2015 #151
No we agree that 17 years ago he came out for it. hrmjustin May 2015 #160
What percentage of Americans embraced marriage equality 19 years ago? nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #165
maybe 25 to 35 percent. why? hrmjustin May 2015 #168
That high? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #174
It was a guess. lets assume 25 percent for the sake of tbis discussion. hrmjustin May 2015 #178
Is that really where you are going to hang your hat? (nt) malokvale77 May 2015 #169
No. hrmjustin May 2015 #171
No? malokvale77 May 2015 #181
Perhaps you should bit clearer about your meaning. hrmjustin May 2015 #182
There was no riddle. (nt) malokvale77 May 2015 #184
You have a lovely night. hrmjustin May 2015 #186
I'm sorry, but waiting until the polls say it's okay, is not a badge of honor. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #159
I like to rec Bernie Sanders threads at DU. nt PufPuf23 May 2015 #81
I Will No Longer Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious May 2015 #103
.... 840high May 2015 #128
Social progress is useless in an economically conservative environment DJ13 May 2015 #108
Only if you're a white man is that actually true. bettyellen May 2015 #136
Problem for me is... malokvale77 May 2015 #117
Truth to me. 840high May 2015 #129
I join you. 840high May 2015 #120
this thread... quickesst May 2015 #135
Bullshit. RiffRandell May 2015 #163
please re-read... quickesst May 2015 #304
The irony here is the idea that longevity of a position treestar May 2015 #339
What accomplishments does Sanders have on equality and LGBT issues? Renew Deal May 2015 #192
Compared to Hillary? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #212
That's hardly an accomplishment. Renew Deal May 2015 #229
But what greater accomplishment does Hillary have? nt MannyGoldstein May 2015 #242
The only way Bernie beats Clinton in the primary ... JoePhilly May 2015 #240
Anyone will beat the Republican jeff47 May 2015 #309
I agree with most of the math ... JoePhilly May 2015 #344
Good point. Trashing Hillary at every opportunity is hardly likely treestar May 2015 #337
Thank you, Manny KMOD May 2015 #281
"finally admitting"? MannyGoldstein May 2015 #286
I haven't heard you voice such loud opinion on social issues before. KMOD May 2015 #290
There's a lot of Douglas Adams in this thread. GoneOffShore May 2015 #299
I don't really care treestar May 2015 #338
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast May 2015 #343
Are you opposed to Hillarys stance on the issue? nt. NCTraveler May 2015 #349
By your own metric, wouldn't this put Warren well behind Clinton if Warren were to enter the race. NCTraveler May 2015 #350
Nice that we have TWO candidates that.... MaggieD May 2015 #354
As a gay man I trust Hillary on LGBT issues. hrmjustin May 2015 #360
I feel the same MaggieD May 2015 #365
. Rex May 2015 #366
As the rec count climbs the personal attacks become ever more frenzied Fumesucker May 2015 #367
Well if there is one thing GLBT people love.... MaggieD May 2015 #369
There are leaders and there are followers Fumesucker May 2015 #373
Bernie has not been a leader on this issue MaggieD May 2015 #376
Oh no doubt, just wondering if MG ever gets tired of it since he should already Rex May 2015 #405
I know the outcome of a lot of my posts these days as I'm sure you do your own Fumesucker May 2015 #419
Just making a point MannyGoldstein May 2015 #406
How many years is Hillary ahead of any one from the (R) clown car? LadyHawkAZ May 2015 #374
It's really ridiculous at this point MaggieD May 2015 #377
And obvious. n/t LadyHawkAZ May 2015 #386
+1 zappaman May 2015 #378
Oh...go hug a tree or something, you hippie! randome May 2015 #387
Yep, this thread is just another Bobbie Jo May 2015 #394
I'm with Bernie all the way, I've donated twice, and will campaign for him.. but I will pull the secondwind May 2015 #398
No Doubt, I've never voted for a Republican . But DOUBT filled my orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #434
Ahead of the loop in many ways . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #428
kick woo me with science May 2015 #435
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At least 17 years!»Reply #373