Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Professor Meets World: Saida Grundy and her comments about white college men [View all]Sobax
(110 posts)112. That's a bit circular
How can you know who is being affected by racism before you've even explained how and why you've defined it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Professor Meets World: Saida Grundy and her comments about white college men [View all]
gollygee
May 2015
OP
"So why the controversy"? It seems the professor is learning a valuable lesson:
Buzz Clik
May 2015
#1
I think the point of the entire article is that the only reason her comments were "controversial"
Number23
May 2015
#9
The fact that they're still happening to the extent they are after 30 years of programs
gollygee
May 2015
#17
This issue is with targeting a population for change and that's been happening.
aikoaiko
May 2015
#94
I have to disagree--if a white professor had made comments about the incidence of homicide
geek tragedy
May 2015
#34
ya, i am exhausted by it also, all the fuggin' time. the reality is, there is a problem with that
seabeyond
May 2015
#42
there is a problem with that demographic, but that problem is the culture in which
geek tragedy
May 2015
#46
from a non academic perspective and the redundancy of the conversation, ... we all need to step up,
seabeyond
May 2015
#50
There is a significant difference between designating a group as a "problem population" on
Number23
May 2015
#142
If you think that 60% of sexual assault claims against white males makes them "underepresented" then
Number23
May 2015
#145
i am telling you. men have been knocking me upside the head for a while now, thinking it will teach
seabeyond
May 2015
#56
the consequence. a woman dare speaks and violence, vulgarity will ensue. be forewarned, and maybe
seabeyond
May 2015
#62
a discussion would be excellent. the point. when SHE starts a discussion, HE's shut it down. nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#41
"Tone" is becoming a social construct in itself; a means of diminishing the impact
Eleanors38
May 2015
#53
no, but she is an educator. no doubt that people who put together her tweets
geek tragedy
May 2015
#47
it is making excuses for fuckin' stupid, abusive, ignorant reactions. that simple.
seabeyond
May 2015
#51
ONE week a year, she is making a statement with her $ earned, and you are on her ass? hey. i do
seabeyond
May 2015
#64
I can only see the world through my own eyes. Even when I try to put myself in someone else's
geek tragedy
May 2015
#71
let me address the beginning. this is the point. the worlds story has been told only thru mens eyes.
seabeyond
May 2015
#73
we are forced to see bivisual, and that is a good term. it is time, men start challenging themselves
seabeyond
May 2015
#76
i call bullshit on this daily. my kids are much better doing it with black and gays. not so well
seabeyond
May 2015
#80
i could not/would not use woman. girl, lady. cause we do not use woman, or just starting.
seabeyond
May 2015
#81
fuck. i use to be one of the nice ones, iwth a nice tone. see what you all did to me?
seabeyond
May 2015
#82
and i may be seeing this wrong. i know i saw a 'comic' relief yesterday about cops beating black
seabeyond
May 2015
#65
So far the professor reveals a bad temper for teaching. I don't mind radical profs...
Eleanors38
May 2015
#61
Her temper still seems bad. I don't much care about occasional demonstrated anger.
Eleanors38
May 2015
#85
interesting. reminds me of young women in the field told to put a mans name on paper before
seabeyond
May 2015
#30
there is nothing safe in challenging white, hetero, (christian), man. nothing. what an absurd
seabeyond
May 2015
#69
cause standards is set way higher for them? academicaly and to be taken seriously? nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#115
she was less sensitive to the fuckwad being insensitive? OMG and you do not see the privilege,
seabeyond
May 2015
#52
it is a confusing story. it is used to manipulate. my point is beyond the particulars.
seabeyond
May 2015
#58
so first i sat listening to this conversation. processing. and i am bottomling, she was not "nice"
seabeyond
May 2015
#54
If they have a screen capture, they could have shown more of the conversation.
gollygee
May 2015
#93
Perhaps, by defaulting to the langauge used by the Academics that study the phenomena? n/t
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#119
Please list your peer-reviewed research on the subject of racism. Thanks.
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#129
True, we are just discussing MY experience in this world. No worries ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#131
And theree's no reason to accept climatologists attempts to control the language ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#106
Yeah ... They, really do ... Well, not a "special mandate", as the refining of terms ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2015
#105