Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: i would +1 this post, but i cannot. Bluenorthwest gave me permission to post this as an OP. [View all]DonCoquixote
(13,950 posts)53. with all due respect
Great. He won't pass anything. If he doesn't offer to give something, Republicans won't work with him at all. Republicans will claim they tried to negotiate and he refused. And they will have the truth on their side. His popularity will plummet. Democrats in the House and Senate will likely turn their backs on him and offer to work with Republicans to get compromise legislation passed over his vetoes.
In the midterms, the Republicans will run against Bernie not working with them, and get veto-proof majorities that allow them to pass anything they want over his vetoes.
Do you honestly think they will NOT do that to Hillary? That is the GOP battleplan all along. Ronal Reagan could get elected and they will bleat this. Asfar as the truth. on their side, if the truth mattered to them and fox news, we would be in a different world.
In the midterms, the Republicans will run against Bernie not working with them, and get veto-proof majorities that allow them to pass anything they want over his vetoes.
Again, what makes you think they do not plan this with Hillary, especially since she is exactly the sort of person that Fox news knows how to explouit? If you think Hillary has some scarecorw like power to frighten away crows fat on Koch funds, and ferarful of losing those funds, you are still living in the 90s.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i would +1 this post, but i cannot. Bluenorthwest gave me permission to post this as an OP. [View all]
seabeyond
May 2015
OP
you are not getting this conversation is not about sanders vs clinton. you cannot get off that.
seabeyond
May 2015
#21
people, mostly men, point the finger at radical fems. not an insult. basically,
seabeyond
May 2015
#24
reminds me of the 'virgin, lesbian, slut' version i went thru with one particular man. lol. nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#32
number two. lol lol. hadnt even registered that. you are so fuckin'ly funny. what a hoot.
seabeyond
May 2015
#37
Did my questions scare you? Why can't you stand up and respond? You sure were free with the snark
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#43
They want economic justice first. Then I guess they believe that will trickle down to social justice
seabeyond
May 2015
#17
this is for you. this path has the same feel i experienced the last 3 yrs with the lesbian/black
seabeyond
May 2015
#15
It's very hard to reach people who are determined not to hear you and who will use
stevenleser
May 2015
#11
i see the excitement with sanders. i ponder the illusions. contradictions. the obvious.
seabeyond
May 2015
#13
it is rather rich to see people talking about how the Democratic party has traded economic
geek tragedy
May 2015
#12
a couple threads made me realize yesterday. sj is not conversation for dems, but the nation, firstly
seabeyond
May 2015
#14
yes and no--yes they are both vital but the economic issues are not necessarily intertwined
geek tragedy
May 2015
#23
i find the dynamics fascinating and so doable. i see the strong demand of the economic and
seabeyond
May 2015
#25
for the last decade women say, you take our vote then walk away. with economic populist
seabeyond
May 2015
#44
No offense, seabeyond - love you for what you do here - but I don't get it.
closeupready
May 2015
#47