Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
44. Great post. This is very important.
Thu May 10, 2012, 01:33 PM
May 2012

I believe that there is a huge difference between "religious" people who have a genuine understanding of love, who I would call spiritual, and not religious, and those that blindly follow some religious dogma written in a book that they use as justification for the boiling hatred that arises from the fear, confusion, shallowness, and corruption of their essential consciousness. These latter selectively use scriptural verse that they believe supports and jusitifies the seething rage of hatred that exists in the darkness of their being, and thereby justifies the unwarranted harm, pain, and destruction that they wantonly inflict upon innocent others in the name of their particular "deity".

They totally disregard other scriptural verse that is contrary to their need to justify, express, and manifest their demented hatred.

I know some wonderful tolerant, loving, giving, sincere people who practice a faith. Awesome folks, very...Loving. They are also horrified by those who use religion as a means to manifest evil and hatred.

And then there are the demented, deluded authoritarian fundamentalists, whose entire existence revolves around their hatred of others. These are very sad, and dangerous creatures. They are without genuine, effective conscience, and if not restricted by reasonable laws, they would ruthlessly take control, through violent means, over those of us who believe in being tolerant of others, and have a "live and let live" attitude towards others.

Reasonable laws are the only way that we can ethically contain these unfortunate people from causing wanton destruction upon individuals and/or societies, because they are completely intolerant of people they view as different from themselves, and do not consider or recognize the fact that harmless, innocent others have a natural right to be different from them.

So, I totally agree with you, cleanhippie.

"

Believers on the left who say "I do this because of my religious views" empower those on the right who say "I do this because of my religious views." Only by taking the common view of "because its the right thing to do" and removing religion completely from the equation will progress be made.

"Religion is not something upon which policy or public values should ever be based on, because by doing so, it legitimizes those that also use religion to oppress and vilify."


Separation of Church and State is crucial to the recognition and preservation of human rights and justice in our society, and we should do everything in our power to insure that Church and State remain completely separate.

Religion has brought unparalleled and unfathomable death, destruction, and psychological and emotional torment to millions of completely innocent human beings throughout history, and continues to do so today.

The widespead, unwarranted, immoral persecution of LGBT persons throughout the world is a crystal clear current illustration of the great harm that religious people cause to innocent human beings.

And this is why we all must insist that religious people be prevented, by law, from being able to harm LGBT folks, or any other innocent group of people, in any way.

Because, in their religious zeal fueled by their crippling fear and burning hatred, they will work diligently and relentlessly to cause harm to LGBT persons, or any other group that they choose to hate, and this could even eventually turn into genocide under certain circumstances, if these insane people are not called out and firmly held in check by law. It has happened all too often in the past.

They have no remorse, because they believe that the harm that they so righteously and gleefully inflict upon others is the will of their god. They can justify any harm they do to others by writing it off as "god's will". After all, it says so right there in the book, in the particular chapter and verse they have selected to justify their mean lttle selves.

Right now they are using the system to harm us, as exemplified by the recent passage of the fascist amendment in North Carolina, legitimizing the unwarranted oppression of LGBT persons by the religious.

We need to call upon our Federal Government to stop this insanity. The LGBT community is basically defenseless as a minority struggling to withstand the onslaught of hate rained down upon us by this insane, hostile, religious majority that exists in many states.

Peace, Love, Light, Freedom, Health, Happiness, and Equality to all.

(If some of what I have written here seems harsh, well, I wrote it that way in the hope that any religious bigot who might read this would recognize themselves in the descriptions of the deadly monster, and upon reflection would have a change of heart, and work on becoming a reasonable, tolerant human being)



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Organized religion is a tool used to control people siligut May 2012 #1
Any organized effort requires control The2ndWheel May 2012 #9
Yes, we agree siligut May 2012 #39
"The religious viewpoint" ended slavery. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #2
Really? It was only the "religious viewpoint" that ended it? It was also the cause, too. cleanhippie May 2012 #3
In what way? The Friends (aka Quakers) were involved and even particiated in the underground RR AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #4
the abolitionists in general came at slavery from a religious viewpoint cali May 2012 #6
Once again, "a small minority." AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #12
This is why using something so subjective, and yet redqueen May 2012 #15
One could also argue that "the religious viewpoint" enabled slavery...nt SidDithers May 2012 #7
one could, but religion really wasn't a pillar of slavery cali May 2012 #10
Ignoring the dog that doesn't bark cthulu2016 May 2012 #17
Actually It Was, Ma'am, And They Did The Magistrate May 2012 #55
Yes, the Bible was used in support of slavery- but religion wasn't cali May 2012 #67
The catholic church has been against slavery since 1741. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #69
The thing about religion is that it can be used to justify anything. backscatter712 May 2012 #21
Thank you gratuitous May 2012 #11
I agree. I'm an atheist and I think the predjudice is unfair. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #19
I am not "attacking" anyone. I am asking liberal believers to stop empowering right-wing believers. cleanhippie May 2012 #20
In my experience "Liberal believers" largely rely on their religious viewpoint for political views lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #22
And this is why I posted my OP in the first place. cleanhippie May 2012 #29
Utterly False cthulu2016 May 2012 #13
Didn't Jesus describe the fair punishment or use of slaves? redqueen May 2012 #16
It merely didn't want to be contentious cthulu2016 May 2012 #18
Unless I'm mistaken, the Civil War ended slavery. daaron May 2012 #25
Also spearheaded the civil rights movement for African Americans. cbayer May 2012 #33
what nonsense. cali May 2012 #5
You're correct, but this may not be a left-right thing. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #8
Agreed. Agree 100%. Taverner May 2012 #14
The God Delusion must be exposed worldwide Roland99 May 2012 #23
I consider your analysis moronic: it is a lazy substitute struggle4progress May 2012 #24
The feeling is mutual. cleanhippie May 2012 #30
I don't doubt the feeling is mutual -- but I at least possess struggle4progress May 2012 #36
Oh, yes, you are so superior to me. cleanhippie May 2012 #38
We can catch more flies with honey than vinegar! daaron May 2012 #26
This is wrong, bigoted, offensive, and counter-productive. bananas May 2012 #27
When you casually throw aroundthe word "bigoted" like this... cleanhippie May 2012 #32
I wasn't casually throwing it around. nt bananas May 2012 #60
"I don't care if a person is gay, just don't be so open about it." ag_dude May 2012 #28
I don't see a call for suppression, merely for separation dmallind May 2012 #35
And we can still guarantee they still have full rights. Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #43
Are you saying that being gay is a lifestyle choice that one makes? cleanhippie May 2012 #45
Elective abortion is a choice. Is it a right? Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #65
There is actually a difference Marrah_G May 2012 #63
You can also choose which political party to support and which papers to read Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #66
Statement of NC Clergy and Faith Leaders Against the Anti-LGBT Constitutional Amendment cbayer May 2012 #31
relevant to the OP's preference for the separation of religion and politics how? dmallind May 2012 #37
We can't and never will stop them. We can only counter them. cbayer May 2012 #51
Hm. That's a really good point, dmallind. daaron May 2012 #54
Any chance to take a swing at liberals of faith. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #34
It is really unfortunate that you are unable to see beyond your own bias. cleanhippie May 2012 #40
THEIR bias?? Union Scribe May 2012 #48
So this is 'fake' progress? randome May 2012 #41
When I trade the word 'religion' in your premise for the word 'philosophy' LanternWaste May 2012 #42
Religion =/= Philosophy daaron May 2012 #59
Great post. This is very important. Zorra May 2012 #44
Thank you. cleanhippie May 2012 #46
My pleasure. Zorra May 2012 #49
Keep this bigoted shit in the religion forum. Union Scribe May 2012 #47
I suspect that due to the fact that it is religious people who fight gay marriage, redqueen May 2012 #52
So one line about current events Union Scribe May 2012 #62
It is "bigoted" to say "I don't agree with your ideas"? DefenseLawyer May 2012 #57
Really? You see this OP as "I don't agree with your ideas"? Union Scribe May 2012 #61
That's the way I see it, yes. DefenseLawyer May 2012 #68
Religion ProSense May 2012 #50
That's weird, because didn't you just Union Scribe May 2012 #53
At Least, Sir, So Far As Matters Concerning Gender Relations And Sexuality Are Concerned The Magistrate May 2012 #56
please post religion threads in the religion forums quinnox May 2012 #58
It's not a thread about religion DefenseLawyer May 2012 #64
Locking ellisonz May 2012 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Until the "religious...»Reply #44