Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HRC on the record [View all]think
(11,641 posts)46. I did and found nothing until you mentioned it above. That's why websites have an about section
To address this on the site itself for clarity.
Not the end of the world but why should people have to try to figure out who's behind a site when most others would put it in the about section and be done with it so as to not cause any confusion?
Just an observation. Sorry....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let me be the first to call bullshit. That is Hillary's Super PAC website, hardly a reliable source
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#1
Ok...post a link that is "neutral" about Hillary that reaches a positive conclusion if you see one.
Sancho
May 2015
#49
Lies aren't needed for Hillary to be deemed disqualified. She's done it all to herself.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#45
pisses you off to no end that she's trying to clarify the lies the Bernie supporters are spreading
Sheepshank
May 2015
#47
it's simply an acknowledgement the info comes from a site HRC has some control over
Sheepshank
May 2015
#53
Just for fun...can you provide a non-propaganda (in your view) pro-Hillary website?
Sancho
May 2015
#44
It's a Pac. That much is a given. Some of the other Pacs actually give a background
think
May 2015
#39
I did and found nothing until you mentioned it above. That's why websites have an about section
think
May 2015
#46