Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Until the "religious viewpoint" on anything is dismissed, we will never have real progress. [View all]The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)55. Actually It Was, Ma'am, And They Did
It is far easier to cite the Bible in support of slavery than i opposition to it. There are numerous statements even in the New Testament that not only sanction it, but advise against manumitted slaves, even if both master and slave are Christian; in the Old Testament there are fully elaborated codes of law, viewed as divine ordinances, for acquiring and treating slaves.
To cite the Bible in opposition to slavery, you have to engage in the 'what this verse really means is...' game. Northern abolitionists certainly did this, and Southerners pretty much made monkeys of the when they tried.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Until the "religious viewpoint" on anything is dismissed, we will never have real progress. [View all]
cleanhippie
May 2012
OP
Really? It was only the "religious viewpoint" that ended it? It was also the cause, too.
cleanhippie
May 2012
#3
In what way? The Friends (aka Quakers) were involved and even particiated in the underground RR
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2012
#4
I am not "attacking" anyone. I am asking liberal believers to stop empowering right-wing believers.
cleanhippie
May 2012
#20
In my experience "Liberal believers" largely rely on their religious viewpoint for political views
lumberjack_jeff
May 2012
#22
You can also choose which political party to support and which papers to read
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2012
#66
Statement of NC Clergy and Faith Leaders Against the Anti-LGBT Constitutional Amendment
cbayer
May 2012
#31
relevant to the OP's preference for the separation of religion and politics how?
dmallind
May 2012
#37
When I trade the word 'religion' in your premise for the word 'philosophy'
LanternWaste
May 2012
#42
I suspect that due to the fact that it is religious people who fight gay marriage,
redqueen
May 2012
#52
At Least, Sir, So Far As Matters Concerning Gender Relations And Sexuality Are Concerned
The Magistrate
May 2012
#56