Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Come the general election, if Hillary Clinton is the nominee they will decide whether to protect Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #1
Amazing.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #2
Look up the definion of the word, "if." I wrote "If Hillary Clinton..." Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #3
The POINT IS.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #4
If (conjunction) used to talk about the result or effect of something that may happen or be true; or Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #5
If, If was a Fifth... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #9
"If Hillary Clinton wins the nomination" It is necessary to agree on the meaing of a post before we Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #39
It's not a matter of "protecting everything" anymore daredtowork Apr 2015 #8
Agreed! LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #10
No, itis protecting what we've won. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #40
Protecting what we have won means keeping another Corporatist DLC dino out of the White House peacebird Apr 2015 #51
I see. 99Forever Apr 2015 #12
hmm. marym625 Apr 2015 #26
Republicans are threatening to revoke the ACA and change Social Security to a voucher. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #41
Ahhh yes... 99Forever Apr 2015 #42
actually it did work fairly well in 2012 dsc Apr 2015 #44
Pardon me, my mistake. 99Forever Apr 2015 #46
Although I completely understand your saying "if" marym625 Apr 2015 #23
It was actually a bit tounge in cheek. 99Forever Apr 2015 #43
No no. not you marym625 Apr 2015 #45
I have noticed her silence. qwlauren35 Apr 2015 #6
Her Silence is Deafening LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #13
Her tenth-percenter owners hifiguy Apr 2015 #20
The objective is to control those they can marym625 Apr 2015 #27
As a Would-Be RobinA Apr 2015 #53
Yes, the browbeating daredtowork Apr 2015 #7
So agree!!! LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #11
Calling Russ Feingold! Fuddnik Apr 2015 #14
+a kazillion! marym625 Apr 2015 #19
Yes. This. Very much this. hifiguy Apr 2015 #29
! Scuba Apr 2015 #50
That would be nice deutsey Apr 2015 #55
+1000 marym625 Apr 2015 #28
Yep, every skeptic immediately became a hater, right-winger, sexist, or paid troll arcane1 Apr 2015 #36
Don't forget your diagnosis of mental illness daredtowork Apr 2015 #38
You said it. I do not like being browbeaten into agreement with others. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #37
Voting Bernie Sanders fbc Apr 2015 #15
I may write him in if he doesn't run marym625 Apr 2015 #18
Me too peacebird Apr 2015 #52
Yep. hifiguy Apr 2015 #21
For Sure... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #32
+1. Jester Messiah Apr 2015 #35
I'm in for Bernie Sanders. krishnarama Apr 2015 #49
Same here MissDeeds Apr 2015 #54
There is a reason there is no Progressive running,,,,,,,,, nt Cryptoad Apr 2015 #16
And that is? KamaAina Apr 2015 #24
see reply 47 Cryptoad Apr 2015 #48
Please do detail..... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #31
I hope you right and there are many declare,,,,,,, Cryptoad Apr 2015 #47
K&R marym625 Apr 2015 #17
No Problem.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2015 #33
I'm a Democrat and I'm not "falling in line" for Hillary. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #22
HRC just started her campaign by channeling EW and Bernie... polichick Apr 2015 #25
Yes, I wish she had started to channel more progressive ideas erronis Apr 2015 #30
Could be a preemptive strike... polichick Apr 2015 #34
kickity! NYC_SKP May 2015 #56
Thank you! LovingA2andMI May 2015 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton’s Progres...»Reply #57