Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does science have a liberal bias? [View all]Exilednight
(9,359 posts)26. Let's look at each.
Climate change: yes, it does have a liberal bias. Above everything else, destroying our environment and ecosystem will literally kill mankind. This should be everyone's top priority. No point in arguing about bombs, economics or anything else if there is no one left.
GMO: somewhat. Science has proven some and disproven others.
Pesticides: All is a strong word. The EPA does need to be funded to meet the needs to determine which are and aren't.
Nuclear energy: the dangers are real, and there are other alternatives. If the government funded solar the same way it funded fossil and nuclear energy, we'd be a lot better off.
Vaccines: the greater good of vaccines greatly outweighs the minute risk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some can't separate bad business practices and the science involved in those businesses.
NuclearDem
May 2015
#1
Science has a liberal bias in that only liberals believe in science. Remember, science hasn't proven
okaawhatever
May 2015
#6
Alas, humans do not and even assuming honesty (a big assumption, at that) accuracy is another issue.
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#13
Unless "science" has at some point been proven to be infallible, "scientific consensus" seems to be
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#9
"Science" (whatever amorphous entity that refers to) has never been said to be infallible.
NuclearDem
May 2015
#16
No matter how good The Scientific Method is, it can be subverted by just about anyone.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#46
I think the left invokes science when it helps and ignores it when it doesn't.
HereSince1628
May 2015
#22
I don't know, but do know that DU's resident scientists are arrogantly biased.
closeupready
May 2015
#25
People who are only interested in using the word "science" as a rhetorical bludgeon should probably
Chathamization
May 2015
#45