Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does science have a liberal bias? [View all]Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)33. I disagree with this.
Many liberal points of view are based on trepidation of the unknown and settling in too quickly on unfounded conclusions.
Case in point: Most liberals are opposed to GMOs. This can be the result of a despise for the predatory business practices of companies like Monsanto, but it is also based on being fearful of not knowing with 100% certainty what will happen from consuming foodstuffs created from genetic manipulation. Unknown (and sometime notorious) "scientists" will toss up outrageous claims that are immediately embraced by the GMO community and never let go despite being disproved by experts in the field.
My observation is that liberals line up with science only coincidentally.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Some can't separate bad business practices and the science involved in those businesses.
NuclearDem
May 2015
#1
Science has a liberal bias in that only liberals believe in science. Remember, science hasn't proven
okaawhatever
May 2015
#6
Alas, humans do not and even assuming honesty (a big assumption, at that) accuracy is another issue.
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2015
#13
Unless "science" has at some point been proven to be infallible, "scientific consensus" seems to be
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#9
"Science" (whatever amorphous entity that refers to) has never been said to be infallible.
NuclearDem
May 2015
#16
No matter how good The Scientific Method is, it can be subverted by just about anyone.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#46
I think the left invokes science when it helps and ignores it when it doesn't.
HereSince1628
May 2015
#22
I don't know, but do know that DU's resident scientists are arrogantly biased.
closeupready
May 2015
#25
People who are only interested in using the word "science" as a rhetorical bludgeon should probably
Chathamization
May 2015
#45