Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
44. If this Party nominated a Reagan official they would lose my vote on every line of the ticket for
Thu May 21, 2015, 06:23 PM
May 2015

good. The fact that straight white conservative Democrats drool over Reagan/Bush Republicans is bad enough. Nominate one and it's bye bye to millions of voters. Count on it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well in developing news....re Jim Webb [View all] nadinbrzezinski May 2015 OP
seems like enough republicans running already nt msongs May 2015 #1
Hey, the only one that will get my endorsement in this is big money nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #2
Interesting. I have been watching him and wondering if he was indeed going to toss his hat in. Raine1967 May 2015 #3
A lot of politics is local nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #4
Well, I haven't reached that level of cynicism yet. Big money is what was running until the sabrina 1 May 2015 #5
I have had a few conversations with former staffers nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #7
So have I, with staff members of several politicians. I prefer to listen to the candidate as I have sabrina 1 May 2015 #10
I am talking nuts and bolts here nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #11
If you're talking about Party politics, that's a different matter, but having worked for nine years sabrina 1 May 2015 #12
Well I run a non partisan media outlet nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #14
Well, I am not obliged to be non-partison or to endorse anything I do not agree with. sabrina 1 May 2015 #15
You misunderstand nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #26
I did misunderstand. This issue needs as much coverage and exposure as possible. sabrina 1 May 2015 #31
Well we are not a democracy nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #34
Not in politics, but 1939 May 2015 #33
Alas this is no longer sausage making nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #35
That would mean at least four candidates on the stage. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #6
'xactly nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #8
Chafee is supposed to run also, so that would make five. The more the merrier. sabrina 1 May 2015 #13
I look forward to hearing what Chafee wants to do Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #22
The more cwydro May 2015 #9
Good. Look forward to hearing more from both him and O'Malley. TwilightGardener May 2015 #16
Yuck. BlueStater May 2015 #17
Look I am only endorsing big money nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18
Martin O'Malley DOB: January 18, 1963. FSogol May 2015 #21
I already know about him. BlueStater May 2015 #29
I don't see him as the best person for the job, but I look Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #23
+1 CharlotteVale May 2015 #39
I think Jim is really running for VP onenote May 2015 #19
I think a few will run for VEEP on both sides nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #20
Or he is running to get exposure for 2020 or 2024. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #24
Webb is already 69. I think this is his one shot. Joe the Revelator May 2015 #25
I did not realize he was that old, but being 60 myself Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #27
He looks 20 years younger. He's like Dick Clark, he never ages apparently. Joe the Revelator May 2015 #28
I actually think that the D should rally behind one overwhelming candidate from the start demtenjeep May 2015 #30
That's risky. There is no such thing as an "overwhelming" candidate. JDPriestly May 2015 #60
I don't see a feasible way to convince all D's to rally behind one person. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #61
I'd like to hear each candidate articulate clear, direct policy positions Warren DeMontague May 2015 #32
Well your first problem is actually with the media nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #36
I agree on most of that, although I think the Iraq War is still a legitimate question. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #38
Oh it is nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #40
I think he has the strongest foreign policy creds of any dem betterdemsonly May 2015 #37
"Hillary's largely mythological foreign policy reputation"? KamaAina May 2015 #41
Being Secretary of State doesn't mean your good at it betterdemsonly May 2015 #42
If this Party nominated a Reagan official they would lose my vote on every line of the ticket for Bluenorthwest May 2015 #44
Assistant Sec of Reserve Affairs isn't exactly a politicized position. betterdemsonly May 2015 #45
Another republican - yay! nt TBF May 2015 #43
"These 9.25" x2.5" vinyl stickers are a cinch to apply and remove with ease" MaggieD May 2015 #46
Maggie Maggie, maggie, all these announcents now have these things nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #47
You puretopians take things WAY too seriously! MaggieD May 2015 #48
More insults from you nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #49
Encouraging you to smile and laugh a little is an insult? MaggieD May 2015 #50
On top of everthing you must be psychic nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #54
Okay - enjoy your misery if that is your choice MaggieD May 2015 #57
You truly need to recalibrate this hat nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #58
Seems like a mix of Obama/Hillary Johonny May 2015 #51
He will challenge Hillary and Bernie from the right. JDPriestly May 2015 #52
Is there a link or is this your article? JDPriestly May 2015 #53
As the OP stated I got that over email nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #55
Webb is too conservative for my taste, but The Velveteen Ocelot May 2015 #56
I just posted it as a point of information nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #59
"Leadership you can trust." Atman May 2015 #62
Well, if you're going to have a boring candidate, might as well give him a boring slogan. BlueStater May 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well in developing news.....»Reply #44