Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: GOD DAMN IT [View all]nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)83. The TPP, like NAFTA is an "agreement"
like the titles say.
They are called "agreements" specifically to get around the 2/3 majority requirement for a Treaty.
As long as the American people allow themselves to be conned, they will continue to be conned.
Treaty vs. Executive Agreement
As explained in greater detail in 11 FAM 721.2, there are two procedures under domestic law through which the United States becomes a party to an international agreement. First, international agreements (regardless of their title, designation, or form) whose entry into force with respect to the United States takes place only after two thirds of the U.S. Senate has given its advice and consent under Article II, section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution are "treaties."
Second, international agreements brought into force with respect to the United States on a constitutional basis other than with the advice and consent of the Senate are "international agreements other than treaties" and are often referred to as "executive agreements." There are different types of executive agreements.
http://www.state.gov/s/l/treaty/faqs/70133.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How about explaining to the people what's in the "Secret Bill"...Did any of these "idjots" bother to read the damn thing?...
InAbLuEsTaTe
May 2015
#109
Feinstein gives us a big FUCK YOU on her way out the door. She is already despised
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#26
Oh shit, how did I get that so wrong...dammit...i knew that of course too
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#118
To be realistic about this, the jobs were gone already. Not ever coming back unless we
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#28
But we expect the Republicons to do such. What is worse is the Democrats that stab us in the back.
rhett o rick
May 2015
#92
Dianne Feinstein. What a loss of a senator. Really sad that she gets elected almost without
JDPriestly
May 2015
#37
I attended a Democratic State Convention some years ago. She spoke and the amazing thing was
JDPriestly
May 2015
#67
There's a reason Jello Biafra called her "Dianne Banker-Buttlicker Margaret Thatcher Feinstien".
HughBeaumont
May 2015
#59
The great state of Washington must bow it's head in shame. Both senators betrayed our party. nm
rhett o rick
May 2015
#93
He's been a corporate whore his entire senate career. Anything to benefit his rich buddies.
peacebird
May 2015
#73
I can feel that sucking sound again. I do know this: Because the Chamber of Commerce and..
BlueJazz
May 2015
#8
I'm starting to learn how Bernie thinks. He'd probably hold a news conference and..
BlueJazz
May 2015
#112
Our democrats. Always looking out for the wealthy, corporations and republicans.
Autumn
May 2015
#18
George Carlin told us all this a long time ago, we didnt listen, did we.
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#31
Did not say that, I said that WE didnt listen to George and what that is all about
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#38
It won't BE Obama negotiating these deals. It's a SIX YEAR bill, so whoever the next President is
sabrina 1
May 2015
#32
There is one small ray of hope. Bernie Sanders, who is running against the corrosive
sabrina 1
May 2015
#45
I agree with you, and have that nagging fear also re Bernie should he succeed.
sabrina 1
May 2015
#97
Pay more attention? I didnt say the post was wrong. Just no need for the insulting language
7962
May 2015
#106
It looks like my 2 senators, Peters & Stabenow, held firm--not that it will do any goddamn good.
catbyte
May 2015
#62
Cantwell is my senator and she will not get my vote the next time she is up for re-election.
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#130