Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:58 PM May 2015

More details about the "mistakes" made by Josh Duggar. From Sarah Posner, Religion Dispatches. [View all]

Josh Duggar and the Purity Lie

Such hypocrites they are.

According to the police report, Jim Bob and Michelle, paragons of parenting, hid Josh’s crimes from the police and the public. In Touch reports, based on the police report it obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, that:

"Josh Duggar was investigated for multiple sex offenses — including forcible fondling — against five minors. Some of the alleged offenses investigated were felonies. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar were interview [sic] by the Springdale Police department on Dec. 12, 2006. The report says that James told police he was alerted in March, 2002 by a female minor that Josh — who turned 14-years-old that month — had been touching her breasts and genitals while she slept. This allegedly happened on multiple occasions. In 2006, Jim Bob told police that in July, 2002 Josh admitted to fondling a minor’s breasts while she slept. “James said that they disciplined (redacted, Josh) after this incident.” The family did not alert authorities."


And more:

In their own statement to People, Jim Bob and Michelle say that “when Josh was a young teenager, he made some very bad mistakes, and we were shocked. We had tried to teach him right from wrong,” that “each one of our family members drew closer to God,” and that they “pray that as people watch our lives they see that we are not a perfect family.”

But the Duggars and their supporters have very deliberately marketed them as a perfect family—or if not perfect, at least pure, and in particular, sexually pure.

The first episode of their “reality” television show aired in 2008, two years after the police interviewed family members about the sexual assaults that had taken place in 2002 and 2003; the statute of limitations had already run and the police could not pursue charges.


Now we know the reality is a very ugly thing.

The Duggars are no ordinary spokespeople for the religious right; they are super-spokespeople. For years, they have been held up as exemplars of biblical living, of devotion to Christ, and of, especially, homespun honest living and sexual purity. It’s long been obvious to many that this is a product of marketing and packaging, not reality. But now no one can pretend anymore.


The purity lie:

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KaBoom!! Duggar family be gone. Peace. nt 7wo7rees May 2015 #1
It's the piety that gets to me. Jessa D said we should judge one another. madfloridian May 2015 #2
First commenter on the article: "Why are they even taken seriously? They are like. . . Journeyman May 2015 #8
perfectibilists, eh? MisterP May 2015 #22
And this child molesting creep workinclasszero May 2015 #3
I wonder how much Josh's wife knew before she got eternally saddled with that creep. Arugula Latte May 2015 #4
She claims he told her -- Hell Hath No Fury May 2015 #5
Let's phrase it right - he got his version out before any of his victims could warn her off. KitSileya May 2015 #16
I have little doubt that she knew the entire story and just didn't care. She married him anyway. StevieM May 2015 #18
A lot of sanctimony here about Christian forgiveness bluestateguy May 2015 #6
Guardian subject line says he resigned from TV show, but article doesn't say so? Confusing. madfloridian May 2015 #7
It's over malaise May 2015 #9
The job he quit was his one at Family Research Council... JHB May 2015 #10
I know. The Guardian still has the misleading title though. madfloridian May 2015 #11
Yeah, speaking of editing... JHB May 2015 #13
always the same lapfog_1 May 2015 #12
I would love to see them gone Tree-Hugger May 2015 #14
+1000 smirkymonkey May 2015 #15
Same here workinclasszero May 2015 #17
Actually, you bring up another interesting point when referring to hookers. StevieM May 2015 #20
Yup and it all goes back to a core belief of fundamentalists of all stripes workinclasszero May 2015 #21
it's EXACTLY how cults work: this goes far beyond "rule by fear" to a point where MisterP May 2015 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author StevieM May 2015 #19
shame on anyone who was a fan of this garbage show Skittles May 2015 #24
How very surprising gratuitous May 2015 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More details about the &q...