Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Excellent. There are
Thu May 10, 2012, 02:42 PM
May 2012

two issues the President can address: repealing DOMA and enacting ENDA, which his statement appears to have brought back to the forefront in Congress.

A bipartisan call for Congressional action on gay rights

By Greg Sargent

Could Obama’s announced support for gay marriage — which won’t have any real impact in legislative terms — help build momentum in other areas where Congress can act on gay rights?

A bipartisan group of Senators is going public today with a call for Senate hearings on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would expand the ban against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity for all but the smallest private-sector employers, I’m told.

The White House came out in support of ENDA as a broader solution after it angered advocates by deciding against an executive order barring same sex discrimination by federal contractors. ENDA is a longtime priority for gay rights advocates, and there’s little chance it would pass this Congress, but the bipartisan group of Senators is hoping to draw attention to the issue in the wake of Obama’s announcement.

Today Dem Senators Jeff Merkley and Bob Casey and GOP Senators Mark Kirk and Susan Collins (who are both Republicans) will release a letter calling on the Senate health and labor committee to hold hearings on ENDA. From the letter:

ENDA would prohibit most workplaces in the United States, with exemptions for religious institutions, private membership clubs and certain small businesses, from discriminating against potential and existing employees on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity. As strong supporters of this legislation, we urge you to schedule a time for Committee members to consider this proposed legislation.

ENDA embodies the American ideal of fairness: employees should be judged on their skills and abilities in the workplace, and not on their sexual orientation or gender identity. While some states prohibit public and private employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, recent studies have found evidence of continued widespread employment discrimination against LGBT people. Sadly, it is still legal for businesses in many states to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

We appreciate your past support for discussing this critical issue for millions of American workers, and we respectfully ask that you ensure an opportunity during this Congress for the full Committee to consider testimony on this bill.

Gay advocates have been pushing for ENDA’s passage for years, and have repeatedly been frustrated each time it has gone nowhere. The bill’s hopes are still slim, but the fact that a couple of moderate Senate Republicans are calling for increased attention to it — via hearings — is a good development. At a minimum, it contrasts sharply with what happened in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives this morning, where Members struck back at Obama’s announcement by passing a measure to stop the Obama Justice Department from opposing the Defense of Marriage Act.

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/a-bipartisan-call-for-congressional-action-on-gay-rights/2012/05/10/gIQA6UAiFU_blog.html

Time to put real pressure on Congress.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

excellent op. thanks for posting it. cali May 2012 #1
Excellent essay. k&r Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #2
Love you Prism. DevonRex May 2012 #3
PFLAG is so great Prism May 2012 #5
Recommended ruggerson May 2012 #4
Well said. pinto May 2012 #6
It's a start Pab Sungenis May 2012 #7
In this case, I think the words were a deed. Prism May 2012 #8
I will, too. I think married LGBT military personnel are the key. DevonRex May 2012 #16
The military point is the most powerful one Prism May 2012 #19
I'm thinking emotionally and legally DevonRex May 2012 #20
I hadn't considered the implications of base movements Prism May 2012 #29
Your 2 cents are worth a million frazzled May 2012 #9
Excellent. There are ProSense May 2012 #10
Thanks, Prism. EFerrari May 2012 #11
kick DevonRex May 2012 #12
Quite Nicely Done ProfessorGAC May 2012 #13
Thank you cate94 May 2012 #14
Thanks. Scurrilous May 2012 #15
Very well said. stevedeshazer May 2012 #17
Prism, I heart you Maven May 2012 #18
K&R suffragette May 2012 #21
K/R. Knew you would. Knew he would, too. NYC_SKP May 2012 #22
thank you for a well thought out post Marrah_G May 2012 #23
Excellent OP! Spazito May 2012 #24
Romney ALWAYS needed to be defeated. -nt CakeGrrl May 2012 #25
"the battle line in the sand for this election" Zorra May 2012 #26
I always enjoy and appreciate your thoughtful essays. myrna minx May 2012 #27
Me too! Hatchling May 2012 #28
The states rights thing Creideiki May 2012 #30
it's good Bluerthanblue May 2012 #31
Wonderful post. Puglover May 2012 #32
very reasonably thought out post ibegurpard May 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama joined us...»Reply #10