Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 37 year old Maggie Gyllenhaal ‘too old’ to play 55-year-old’s love interest [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)38. i liked the movie and i like both actors. i had a tough time watching the movie because of the age
split.
same with harrison. now he is older, i have no interest in watching him matched up with someone two decades younger.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
37 year old Maggie Gyllenhaal ‘too old’ to play 55-year-old’s love interest [View all]
Liberal_in_LA
May 2015
OP
There was a funny video about that topic recently, I don't recall where I saw it
arcane1
May 2015
#2
That comment nugget is sexist and ageist! 50 y o women are beautiful and many are wise.
Dont call me Shirley
May 2015
#17
...and how do you tell by one photo? Let me take 20 photos of you and then pick out...
BlueJazz
May 2015
#138
Wha? I was responding to 4319's derogatory comment about Maggie looking 50.
Dont call me Shirley
May 2015
#139
I'm an Idiot. Note to self: Do not eat ice cream, watch TV and post to the wrong poster.
BlueJazz
May 2015
#141
That's a different discussion, and we'd probably find ourselves in agreement
DavidDvorkin
May 2015
#81
There's no way in hell she looks 50. I don't even think she looks 37. She looks younger than
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#116
If I didn't know anything about her, I'd guess she was in her late forties.
DavidDvorkin
May 2015
#137
She might look like Hollywood's version of 50. But she doesn't look like a typical 50 year old.
pnwmom
May 2015
#60
Well, every casting decision should be based on what makes you pitch a tent, huh?
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#83
economic vs social justice. she has $ so fuck misogyny. doesnt matter, irrelevant. financially,
seabeyond
May 2015
#36
so if a white director told Chris Rock he was too dark-skinned for an African American role, that'd be ok?
zazen
May 2015
#110
Then that would be a social issue involving short-shaming or something I guess. nt
Bonobo
May 2015
#159
they are intentionally ignoring the point. again. economic justice vs social. SURELY if there is
seabeyond
May 2015
#37
i liked the movie and i like both actors. i had a tough time watching the movie because of the age
seabeyond
May 2015
#38
In the Manchurian Candidate (the 1962 version), Angela Lansbury was only 3 years older
hughee99
May 2015
#161
Guy is 55? Wonder if he's James Spader/Rupert Everett/Hugh Laurie/Vincent D'Onofrio/Kevin Spacey/
valerief
May 2015
#42
Yeah, a lot of that type of thinking from the Suits of Hollywood and it is so boringly wrong. It's
Cha
May 2015
#61
Maggie G has frequently appeared in the theater in challenging roles, she is excellent on stage.
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#71
age diference in marriage is like 2.3 years. and yearly, is going down. pretty much tells us
seabeyond
May 2015
#96
Because older and younger men are the only ones who spend money to watch movies? n/t
seaglass
May 2015
#100
Do you see that as a problem for women? That executives/casting directors kowtow to male hangups to
seaglass
May 2015
#109
I think when it happens to you, it is an oh wow moment. Don't know how old you are but
seaglass
May 2015
#134
you think us women dont want a hot 19 yr old? ya right buddy. then the reality.
seabeyond
May 2015
#111
i think whats his name, you used? clooney stepped over the line of old the last couple of years.
seabeyond
May 2015
#126
old is old. we all have had a lifetime of being told men do not count in old. nt
seabeyond
May 2015
#130
i want to know how "attractive" stone age women were. do tell. you are the one linking "attractive"
seabeyond
May 2015
#147
You're in essence saying yes it's sexist but it's the way it is so just accept it
treestar
May 2015
#114
What an idiot. That movie will be missing out on outstanding actress. Probably even an actress that
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#84
They all call for a younger woman and an older man. That's the problem. We're obsessed with seeing
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#86
Of course they don't have to be realistic, but sometimes it is nice to see Hollywood do something
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#88
You may not be, but I am. The reason some plot stories call for a younger woman and an older man
liberal_at_heart
May 2015
#91