Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
32. I hope you enjoy primary sources
Fri May 22, 2015, 11:16 PM
May 2015

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EDT, TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2015CB 15-76
BEA 15-20
FT-900 (15-03)



* See the navigation bar at the right side of the news release text for links to data tables, contact personnel and their telephone numbers, and supplementary materials.

U.S. Census Bureau
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
NEWS
U.S. Department of Commerce * Washington, DC 20230
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN GOODS AND SERVICES
March 2015


The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, through the Department of
Commerce, announced today that the goods and services deficit was $51.4 billion in March, up
$15.5 billion from $35.9 billion in February, revised. March exports were $187.8 billion, $1.6
billion more than February exports. March imports were $239.2 billion, $17.1 billion more than
February imports.

The March increase in the goods and services deficit reflected an increase in the goods deficit
of $14.9 billion to $70.6 billion and a decrease in the services surplus of $0.6 billion to
$19.2 billion.

Year-to-date, the goods and services deficit increased $6.4 billion, or 5.2 percent, from the
same period in 2014. Exports decreased $11.7 billion or 2.0 percent. Imports decreased
$5.3 billion or 0.8 percent.

Goods and Services Three-Month Moving Averages (Exhibit 2)

The average goods and services deficit increased $1.9 billion to $43.3 billion for the three
months ending in March.
* Average exports of goods and services decreased $2.4 billion to $187.8 billion in March.
* Average imports of goods and services decreased $0.5 billion to $231.1 billion in March.

Year-over-year, the average goods and services deficit increased $2.1 billion from the three
months ending in March 2014.
* Average exports of goods and services decreased $3.9 billion from March 2014.
* Average imports of goods and services decreased $1.8 billion from March 2014.

Exports (Exhibits 3, 6, and 7)

Exports of goods increased $1.5 billion to $127.1 billion in March.
Exports of goods on a Census basis increased $1.3 billion.
* Capital goods increased $1.5 billion.
o Civilian aircraft increased $0.5 billion.
o Civilian aircraft engines increased $0.2 billion.
o Electric apparatus increased $0.2 billion.
Net balance of payments adjustments increased $0.2 billion.

Exports of services increased $0.2 billion to $60.8 billion in March.
* Transport, which includes freight and port services and passenger fares, increased
$0.1 billion.
* Travel (for all purposes including education) decreased $0.1 billion.

Imports (Exhibits 4, 6, and 8)

Imports of goods increased $16.4 billion to $197.6 billion in March.
Imports of goods on a Census basis increased $16.4 billion.
* Consumer goods increased $9.0 billion.
o Cell phones and other household goods increased $1.7 billion.
o Other textile apparel and household goods increased $1.3 billion.
o Furniture, household goods, etc. increased $1.0 billion.
* Capital goods increased $4.0 billion.
* Automotive vehicles, parts, and engines increased $2.7 billion.
Net balance of payments adjustments decreased $0.1 billion.

Imports of services increased $0.8 billion to $41.6 billion in March.
* Transport increased $0.6 billion.
* Travel (for all purposes including education) increased $0.1 billion.

Real Goods in 2009 Dollars – Census Basis (Exhibit 11)

The real goods deficit increased $16.0 billion to $67.2 billion in March.
* Real exports of goods increased $1.3 billion to $118.8 billion.
* Real imports of goods increased $17.3 billion to $186.0 billion.

Revisions

Revisions to February exports
* Exports of goods were revised downward less than $0.1 billion.
* Exports of services were revised downward less than $0.1 billion.

Revisions to February imports
* Imports of goods were revised upward $0.5 billion.
* Imports of services were revised downward $0.1 billion.

Goods by Selected Countries and Areas: Monthly – Census Basis (Exhibit 19)

The March figures show surpluses, in billions of dollars, with South and Central America ($2.9),
OPEC ($0.7), and Brazil ($0.4). Deficits were recorded, in billions of dollars, with China
($37.8), European Union ($11.0), Japan ($6.3), Germany ($5.6), Mexico ($4.8), South Korea
($2.6), Italy ($2.1), India ($2.0), France ($1.5), Canada ($1.4), United Kingdom ($0.2), and
Saudi Arabia ($0.1).

* The deficit with China increased $10.5 billion to $37.8 billion in March. Exports increased
$0.4 billion to $9.3 billion and imports increased $10.9 billion to $47.1 billion.
* The deficit with Japan increased $2.0 billion to $6.3 billion in March. Exports increased
$0.2 billion to $5.6 billion and imports increased $2.2 billion to $11.9 billion.

NOTES:
* All statistics referenced are seasonally adjusted; statistics are on a balance of payments
basis unless otherwise specified. Additional statistics, including not seasonally adjusted
statistics and details for goods on a Census basis, are available in Exhibits 1-20b of this
release. For information on data sources, definitions, and scheduled release dates through
December 2015, see the information section on page A-1 of this release. The next release
is June 3, 2015.

* For definitions of goods on a balance of payments basis, goods on a Census basis, and net
balance of payments adjustments, see the information section on page A-1 of this release.

NOTICE

New U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis International Trade and Investment Country Factsheets

On May 4, 2015, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released a new data application on
its Web site. The International Trade and Investment Country Facts application provides
information on U.S. trade in goods and services, direct investment, and the activities of
multinational enterprises for individual countries and country groupings. Users select a country
from an interactive world map or a searchable menu. The application generates a country factsheet
with graphs and tables showing the latest data on U.S. trade and investment with that country.
The factsheet can be downloaded or printed in PDF format. The application also generates data
tables containing more detailed statistics that can be downloaded in Excel format.

The application can be accessed from (www.bea.gov/international/factsheet). If you have
questions, please contact BEA’s Balance of Payments Division at
(InternationalAccounts@bea.gov).

New U.S. Census Bureau Report on U.S. International Trade in Goods

On July 30, 2015, at 8:30 a.m., the U.S. Census Bureau will introduce a new release, “Advance
Report: U.S. International Trade in Goods.” This report will:

* Be released monthly, 4-7 business days in advance of the “U.S. International Trade in
Goods and Services” report (FT-900).
* Present advance statistics for the reference month. For example, the July 30 release will
feature advance statistics for June 2015.
* Contain statistics for international trade in goods on a Census basis by principal end-use
category.
* Include both seasonally adjusted and not seasonally adjusted statistics.
* Not include statistics for trade in goods on a balance of payments basis or statistics for
trade in services, both of which will continue to be featured in the FT-900.
* Be available at (www.census.gov/trade).

In accordance with Section 7 of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Statistical Policy
Directive No. 3, OMB granted the Census Bureau an exception to the previously approved schedule
for the release of the FT-900. OMB granted the exception for the sole purpose of publicly
releasing advance monthly statistics on trade in goods.

The new report will present two sets of statistics: “Advance” statistics, which reflect partial
coverage, and “Final” statistics, which reflect complete coverage and correspond to the most
recently published statistics in Exhibits 6 and 13 of the FT-900. Sample exhibits of the new
report are available at (www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/notices/20150405_advrelease.html).

The release schedule for this report through December 2015 is as follows:

Statistical Month Date Day

June 07-30-15 Thu
July 08-28-15 Fri
August 09-29-15 Tue
September 10-28-15 Wed
October 11-24-15 Tue
November 12-29-15 Tue

If you have questions, please contact the Census Bureau, Economic Indicators Division, on
(800) 549-0595, option 4, on (301) 763-2311, or at (eid.international.trade.data@census.gov).

Upcoming Revisions to Goods and Services

On June 3, 2015, the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) will release
“U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: April 2015” and “U.S. International Trade in
Goods and Services: Annual Revision for 2014.” With these releases, statistics on trade in goods,
on both a Census basis and a balance of payments (BOP) basis, will be revised beginning with 2012,
and statistics on trade in services will be revised beginning with 1999. The revised statistics
for goods on a BOP basis and for services will also be included in the report “U.S. International
Transactions: First Quarter 2015 and Annual Revisions” and in the annual revision of the
U.S.International Transactions Accounts (ITAs), both to be released by BEA on June 18, 2015.

Goods

Revised statistics on trade in goods will reflect 1) corrections and adjustments to previously
published not-seasonally-adjusted statistics for goods on a Census basis, 2) recalculated
seasonal and trading-day adjustments, and 3) newly available and revised source data on BOP
adjustments, which are adjustments that BEA applies to goods on a Census basis to convert them
to a BOP basis. BOP adjustments are presented as net adjustments in this release.

Services

Revised statistics on trade in services beginning with 1999 will reflect the reclassification
of repairs related to Foreign Military Sales from exports of government goods and services n.i.e.
(not included elsewhere) to exports of maintenance and repair services n.i.e. This
reclassification will result in more accurate international account statistics and will bring
BEA’s statistics into closer alignment with international guidelines, which recommend that
services supplied by and to governments be classified to a specific services category where
possible.

Revised statistics on trade in services beginning with 2012 will also reflect 1) newly available
and revised source data primarily from BEA’s surveys of international services transactions, 2)
revised seasonal adjustments, and 3) revised interpolations of quarterly source data to monthly
statistics (see the information section on page A-4 of this release).

A preview of BEA’s 2015 annual revision of the ITAs was published in the April 2015 Survey of
Current Business. If you have questions, please contact BEA’s
Balance of Payments Division at (InternationalAccounts@bea.gov).

To learn more about the FT-900 and other economic indicators the Census Bureau publishes, join
the Economic Indicators Division for the “Investigating Economic Indicators” Webinar series.
For more information, visit (www.census.gov/econ/webinar).

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/tradnewsrelease.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If 95% of the world wants our stuff, then why do we import so much from China? n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #1
I don't think that's exactly what he said ucrdem May 2015 #2
Thanks! n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #4
utter horseshit.. sendero May 2015 #9
The statistics say otherwise: ucrdem May 2015 #12
No .. sendero May 2015 #16
Yes, they do. nt ucrdem May 2015 #17
Na na na/... sendero May 2015 #18
+1 840high May 2015 #48
+1. POS. It's obvious to anyone with two brains cells to rub together. GoneFishin May 2015 #103
The jury said: In_The_Wind May 2015 #30
The OP is about SOS Kerry's OP on TPP and that he agrees. He's not "fabricating" anything.. but, Cha May 2015 #62
Wow, that's disgusting. Major Hogwash May 2015 #89
"meme at DU is that the TPP is bad, since so many anonymous DU people say it is." Dawgs May 2015 #100
Even they probably don't like it, but are rich enough not to care about working Americans. GoneFishin May 2015 #104
In fact republicans (non-politicians) oppose it and Democrats (non-politicians) support it. pampango May 2015 #115
Nope. Polls show that Democrats are more for free trade than Republicans. Dawgs May 2015 #141
Uh . . . except they don't. Major Hogwash May 2015 #142
Uh, being against it until something is added is not "wanting this agreement". Dawgs May 2015 #144
So, it's a mystery why they would vote to give the President fast track authority! Major Hogwash May 2015 #148
"Your posts are 100% bullshit all the time and you post non-sequitur horsecrap that you act as Cha May 2015 #63
Nice post. "Your posts are 100% bullshit all the time ..." Thanks for adding to the discussion. pampango May 2015 #113
Think about this. PETRUS May 2015 #20
U-turn exports. Make 1,000 radiators in Michigan and ship them to the Ford factory in Mexico where Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #22
$1.4 trillion in exports does not come from shuffling radiators. nt ucrdem May 2015 #25
And 10 trillion dollars in trade deficits the past 30 years came from horrible fake free trade deals Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #28
Link? ucrdem May 2015 #37
Actually, its worse than 10 trillion. Figures from 1989 to early 2015. Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #66
This thread sounds like Heritage Foundation fake free trade lovefest taking place right here on DU. Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #68
John Kerry is pushing Heritage Foundation repuke legistlation? ucrdem May 2015 #70
Heritage, CATO, and the repukes are 100% behind the big TPP turd. Some of the talking points Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #72
Oh? You're keeping up with CATO and Heritage Foundation? ucrdem May 2015 #73
All I need to to do is read your TPP posts. You and them are two TPPeas in a pod. (nm) Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #79
Google's a fascinating tool Scootaloo May 2015 #84
yes cali May 2015 #77
You two might want get your stories straight. nt ucrdem May 2015 #82
Don't worry about it much, ucrdem. Major Hogwash May 2015 #87
hey thanks, yeah I noticed some are a little weak in the truth department. nt ucrdem May 2015 #111
Actually, you're misreading the numbers. nt ucrdem May 2015 #110
It's never reached ONE trillion: ucrdem May 2015 #112
In 2014 our trade deficit with our 20 "free trade" partners was $65 billion (3% of trade with them). pampango May 2015 #117
Exactly. Many of the statistics are bastardized like that. Taxpayer funded weapons exports GoneFishin May 2015 #105
Why yes, they are. nt ucrdem May 2015 #109
Incidentally the 2014 trade deficit was less than one trillion: ucrdem May 2015 #108
I'm talking about the cumulative total since the 1980s. Its several trillion total. (nm) Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #139
We all can play those games, but I prefer something approaching full data nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #24
I prefer data with links. nt ucrdem May 2015 #29
I hope you enjoy primary sources nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #32
No charts at link but thanks for playing. nt ucrdem May 2015 #33
The link is the latest release from the Federal Government nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #35
Still no link for the charts. nt ucrdem May 2015 #36
So you want old charts over the LATEST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RELEASE? nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #39
Yes, suspiciously old charts. It seems the US trade deficit is, in fact, declining ucrdem May 2015 #42
And the May of this year data is also old nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #54
More than 90% of our trade deficit comes from countries with no 'free trade' agreement. pampango May 2015 #118
Except that there was no deficit with Mexico nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #122
Bullhinky 840high May 2015 #49
But what are we exporting? The bulk of US exports is military Exilednight May 2015 #102
And speaking of China . . . ucrdem May 2015 #26
and speaking of the tpp...... China is not a partner nation in it cali May 2015 #78
Exactly! And that's the point that so many are missing. jazzimov May 2015 #134
Good point. Major Hogwash May 2015 #88
Funny that so many disagree. Only the corporate puppets agree with Kerry. No one has explained rhett o rick May 2015 #52
If it's so great, don't give us his or anyone else's interpretation of it, STOP TREATING sabrina 1 May 2015 #53
when we export agricultural products, our own citizens are deprived... grasswire May 2015 #59
Because we are Biafra? ucrdem May 2015 #65
Exactly. nt scarletwoman May 2015 #3
I'm certainly not an expert, but it seems to me these deals are not always favorable RKP5637 May 2015 #5
The sentiment is out there, no doubt about it ucrdem May 2015 #6
Good points! n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #8
Thank you! ucrdem May 2015 #27
that's just the stuff we see treestar May 2015 #133
....and we want medicine to be more expensive for all of them! djean111 May 2015 #7
kerry ignores (of course) that TPP is about corporate control n has zip to do with consumers nt msongs May 2015 #10
80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day TexasBushwhacker May 2015 #11
But, they can build our stuff. n/t PowerToThePeople May 2015 #14
TPP is between US and 11 Pacific rim countries ucrdem May 2015 #15
It is worth noting that the 11 countries is suppose to be a starting point davidpdx May 2015 #86
Or more importantly, 95% of the people who will work under slavery conditions. /nt Marr May 2015 #13
They would if there were no regulations to prevent employers from abusing them ucrdem May 2015 #19
Really? Have you read it? A Little Weird May 2015 #101
KnR ucrdem Hekate May 2015 #21
Thanks Hekate! ucrdem May 2015 #23
everyone knows at this point that the administration has their lies straight Doctor_J May 2015 #31
Kerry is lying? On which points exactly? ucrdem May 2015 #34
uhh, that this piece of shit will be good for Americans? Doctor_J May 2015 #38
Can you identify the specific statements that are lies? ucrdem May 2015 #40
I'll tell you one. subterranean May 2015 #55
I don't see him saying that, but exports HAVE dropped in the last two years ucrdem May 2015 #58
I was referring mainly to the second paragraph in your excerpt. subterranean May 2015 #67
Krugman got chewed out by some of his readers and decided it wasn't worth trying to Hoyt May 2015 #41
Probably. I noticed that his beef is with the secrecy, not the deal itself ucrdem May 2015 #44
Yes, he even gripes about he ISDS that he knows is in NAFTA and hundreds of other agreements. Hoyt May 2015 #56
Weak. Wyden's reasons for voting against his own bill were also weak. ucrdem May 2015 #61
Thank you, ucr! Cha May 2015 #43
Hey thanks Cha . . . ucrdem May 2015 #45
Facts from SOS John Kerry but of course so many don't want to hear that.. 'cause Fear Mongering/ Cha May 2015 #46
If it ain't FUD it ain't real is how the ODS crowd rolls. ucrdem May 2015 #47
Yeah, I love being in the Cha May 2015 #57
Isn't it! Hard to stay postive with so much full-bore wingnuttery flying aound ucrdem May 2015 #64
They are both intelligent, caring men who have earned my trust.. why wouldn't I.. as opposed to Cha May 2015 #71
Yep. ucrdem May 2015 #146
Ditto, ditto, ditto MBS May 2015 #93
Ditto back atcha MBS! ucrdem May 2015 #145
yeah. MBS May 2015 #94
"..if we don't lead on this, China or someone else (or -shudder- a future US administration who Cha May 2015 #96
Hey sweetie................ sheshe2 May 2015 #76
"The solution lies not in shutting the door to trade itself, but in transforming the system to make Cha May 2015 #83
As far as I'm concerned, it's worse than that. Much worse. Major Hogwash May 2015 #90
I remember Robb.. and of course, The Magistrate! I miss 'em.. Cha May 2015 #95
Robb was very kind to me when I first came here to DU. Major Hogwash May 2015 #97
I remember going round and round Cha May 2015 #98
It was like a carnival here back then. Major Hogwash May 2015 #143
Please MFrohike May 2015 #50
Ah the love for John Kerry and the hell with the unions and workers of this country. rhett o rick May 2015 #51
and I'm sure that Heinz is looking forward to the TPP. nt grasswire May 2015 #60
Reading the posts above, it almost seems as if the Heritage Foundation and RNC ended their Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #69
I never thought neverforget May 2015 #74
It's not that they trust Republicons they completely trust anyone labeled Democrat. rhett o rick May 2015 #116
So we should never trust a Republican who changes labels? ucrdem May 2015 #121
Nice try, but your logic fails. I said we should judge by principles not labels. rhett o rick May 2015 #136
WaPo: 3 pro-labor economists on why TPP benefits American workers ucrdem May 2015 #119
The republicans have three climate scientists who say global warming is a hoax. BillZBubb May 2015 #135
The exceptions that make the rule. nm rhett o rick May 2015 #138
They fail to mention how that translates into benefits for workers. Benefits for rhett o rick May 2015 #137
Kerry clearly has no or very little experience with the trade courts and has not JDPriestly May 2015 #75
"The Kerry speech is pure hogwash as far as I am concerned." Major Hogwash May 2015 #91
I have to add another comment to this thread. JDPriestly May 2015 #80
He was also wrong about NAFTA. Friends in Ohio that lost jobs because of it, Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #81
So fucking what? TPP is agout corporate dictatorship, not trade eridani May 2015 #85
Thank you, UCRdem MBS May 2015 #92
"strengthening international labor....standards"-----THAT? Is how you know he's lying. LYING. WinkyDink May 2015 #99
Translation... Wounded Bear May 2015 #106
We don't make anything here any more. What the hell is he talking about? onecaliberal May 2015 #107
Kerry is full of it. His argument is laughable on its face. BillZBubb May 2015 #114
Yet, nearly 100% of the people whom you represent live within these borders. lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #120
Kerry: "the US has added 12.3 million jobs over 62 straight months of private sector growth" ucrdem May 2015 #123
Men today have to work 50 hours to earn what their fathers did in 40 lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #124
LOL, tell me about it. ucrdem May 2015 #127
No. It's the same issue. lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #129
SO what, this is a giveaway to the richest people on the planet. Rex May 2015 #125
If TPP is NAFTA on steroids employment and wages are going to go through the roof. ucrdem May 2015 #126
So, nothing about the millions unemployed still from the 2008 giveaway? Rex May 2015 #128
Yep employment and wages. Notice the pattern: ucrdem May 2015 #130
People have less than they did in the 1970s and work more for less. Rex May 2015 #132
Hahaha!!!! Major Hogwash May 2015 #147
Makes sense treestar May 2015 #131
I have two issues with Kerry's remarks... ljm2002 May 2015 #140
I don't understand his claim that 95% or the world's consumers live beyond the borders of the polly7 May 2015 #149
They're using trade as a cover for more corporate profits and more corporate control of Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #150
I hate every one of these 'Free' trade deals. polly7 May 2015 #151
Kerry lives in the Washington money bubble. He is a big money corporate dem just like Elwood P Dowd May 2015 #153
What percentage of manufacturing occurs outside the US? merrily May 2015 #152
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Kerry on TPP: "...»Reply #32