Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert Kraft-Patriots won't appeal ruling [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)48. I think once they lied about how accessible the ball boy was (and they did lie about that)
he figured he wasn't going to get a fair shake.
Also, I wouldn't trust some ass that had the Thank You For Smoking/asbestos doesn't harm auto workers team to keep my personal information safe. Lord only knows what was on his cellphone that was entirely unrelated to football but might be of a very personal nature--and he's going to hand that over to someone who was given an agenda to burn him (and that agenda has been pretty much admitted by the NFL commissioner)? Or to people who leaked FALSE information like a sieve? Screw that.
Goodell doesnt answer question about media leaks
During Wednesdays press conference that ended the quarterly ownership meeting in San Francisco, Tom Curran of CSN New England asked Commissioner Roger Goodell a pointed question regarding media leaks by the league during the #DeflateGate investigation.
In response, Goodell referred generally to the report generated by Ted Wells. When Curran followed with a specific question about the leagues leak of the false information that 11 of the 12 Patriots footballs were two pounds under the 12.5 PSI minimum, Goodell said that Ted Wells had the opportunity to evaluate that.
While Wells may have had the opportunity to evaluate whether the NFL deliberately leaked false PSI data, possibly to create an opening narrative of presumed tampering that would trigger a scorched-earth investigation of the Patriots, Wells didnt address the topic at all in his report.
As noted by Mike Reiss of ESPN.com, Wells devoted only one paragraph to the notion that the investigation arose in whole or in part from an agenda against the Patriots. The 243-page document says nothing about whether Wells explored the leak of false information a leak that likely led directly to the decision to bring in Wells for another multi-million-dollar probe....
It's starting to look like the NFL wanted to give other, underperforming teams the opportunity to win by trying to kneecap the team that did the hard work. The longer this goes on, the more that people who don't even particularly like the Patriots are acknowledging this. They're probably saying this because no one likes rule by decree, and arbitrary decision making, and they know that there but for the grace of talent and effort go they.
More at link. NFL is looking like idiots. This will probably end up in court, Goodell will end up on the stand, and he won't be a happy camper if it comes to that. Hope he's got another gig to go to, because he's being shown the exit and he doesn't apparently even realize it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, I'd definitely give my personal cell phone to my employer if they asked.
bluedigger
May 2015
#35
I've never been to a game and I rarely watch them. I could hardly be called a fan.
MADem
May 2015
#29
I honestly don't know. I know that they cherry-picked the conversations, and they used
MADem
May 2015
#31
He has hired a superb lawyer with whom he has worked previously on player dispute matters.
MADem
May 2015
#18
I don't think you're laughing at all--it's obvious that you are furious at these turns of events.
MADem
May 2015
#42
I think once they lied about how accessible the ball boy was (and they did lie about that)
MADem
May 2015
#48
If they appeal it to a federal court I would assume he would have to answer this question under oath
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#52
It reminds me of the Paula Jones Case that led to Clinton's impeachment.
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2015
#54
Again. I just posted links to actual articles about Gooddell not recusing himself
R B Garr
May 2015
#72
No, that's not 'just' what you did--anyone reading this thread can see what you've said, here.
MADem
May 2015
#73
Not just now--throughout this exchange! They're your very own emotional words! Own them!
MADem
May 2015
#78
Yes--YOUR emotions, angst, agita and anger. That "came through you." I just noticed it.
MADem
May 2015
#88
Yeah...but you didn't read the article. You counted on the headline, and it let you down!
MADem
May 2015
#91
Report: Roger Goodell Rejects Request To Recuse Himself From Tom Brady's Appeal
R B Garr
May 2015
#77