Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
57. As those on the ends of the teeter totter glare at each other, the crooks get away with the cash.
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:43 PM
May 2015

Remember Richard (PNAC/Another Pearl Harbor) Perle? Just after September 11 and the Washington-Wall Street axis of war profiteering was heating up, Perle hit up Adnan (Iran-Contra/BCCI) Khashoggi for $100 million to make his new "Trireme Partnerships" take off.



Khashoggi's money would help launch the Carlyle Group-like investment group Perle founded. The petromoney was not for arms, directly. It was for investing in companies that were going to be making a killing off of homeland security related areas.

Interesting selling point: Perle already had secured financing from in from Boeing and some other bigwigs like Henry Kissinger.

One of the most important articles The New Yorker ever published:



Lunch with the Chairman

by Seymour M. Hersh
17 March 2003

At the peak of his deal-making activities, in the nineteen-seventies, the Saudi-born businessman Adnan Khashoggi brokered billions of dollars in arms and aircraft sales for the Saudi royal family, earning hundreds of millions in commissions and fees. Though never convicted of wrongdoing, he was repeatedly involved in disputes with federal prosecutors and with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and in recent years he has been in litigation in Thailand and Los Angeles, among other places, concerning allegations of stock manipulation and fraud. During the Reagan Administration, Khashoggi was one of the middlemen between Oliver North, in the White House, and the mullahs in Iran in what became known as the Iran-Contra scandal. Khashoggi subsequently claimed that he lost ten million dollars that he had put up to obtain embargoed weapons for Iran which were to be bartered (with Presidential approval) for American hostages. The scandals of those times seemed to feed off each other: a congressional investigation revealed that Khashoggi had borrowed much of the money for the weapons from the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (B.C.C.I.), whose collapse, in 1991, defrauded thousands of depositors and led to years of inquiry and litigation.

Khashoggi is still brokering. In January of this year, he arranged a private lunch, in France, to bring together Harb Saleh al-Zuhair, a Saudi industrialist whose family fortune includes extensive holdings in construction, electronics, and engineering companies throughout the Middle East, and Richard N. Perle, the chairman of the Defense Policy Board, who is one of the most outspoken and influential American advocates of war with Iraq.

The Defense Policy Board is a Defense Department advisory group composed primarily of highly respected former government officials, retired military officers, and academics. Its members, who serve without pay, include former national-security advisers, Secretaries of Defense, and heads of the C.I.A. The board meets several times a year at the Pentagon to review and assess the country’s strategic defense policies.

Perle is also a managing partner in a venture-capital company called Trireme Partners L.P., which was registered in November, 2001, in Delaware. Trireme’s main business, according to a two-page letter that one of its representatives sent to Khashoggi last November, is to invest in companies dealing in technology, goods, and services that are of value to homeland security and defense. The letter argued that the fear of terrorism would increase the demand for such products in Europe and in countries like Saudi Arabia and Singapore.

CONTINUED...

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/03/17/030317fa_fact



A bit on the new TRIREME business...



At Hollinger, Big Perks in A Small World

By Steven Pearlstein
Wednesday, November 19, 2003; Page E01

It's amazing the coincidences you find digging into Hollinger International, the publishing empire that includes Chicago's Sun-Times and London's Daily Telegraph and is quickly slipping from Conrad Black's control.

Let's start with the board of directors, which includes Barbara Amiel, Conrad's wife, whose right-wing rants have managed to find an outlet in Hollinger publications.

And there's Washington superhawk Richard Perle, who heads Hollinger Digital, the company's venture capital arm. Seems that Hollinger Digital put $2.5 million in a company called Trireme Partners, which aims to cash in on the big military and homeland security buildup. As luck would have it, Trireme's managing partner is none other than . . . Richard Perle.

Perle, of course, has been pushing hard for just such a military buildup from his other perch at the Pentagon's secretive and influential Defense Policy Board, where there are a number of other Friends of Hollinger.

CONTINUED (archived nowadays)...

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-309818.html



It's why I keep bringing up Dallas, Maedhros. Those who remember the JFK Administration know it wasn't always Buy Partisan "money trumps peace."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why is this important? pnwmom May 2015 #1
And a country with a lot of complicated and shifting internal factions Recursion May 2015 #2
Links have been posted here with articles by journalists Mojorabbit May 2015 #40
Do you mind if I roll my eyes? Recursion May 2015 #41
No because it was exactly what I expected from you! nt Mojorabbit May 2015 #42
dupe Mojorabbit May 2015 #42
It's important because this is.... MaggieD May 2015 #3
You got that right. randome May 2015 #14
list them all- Parry, Palast, Bernstein, Rather, etc reddread May 2015 #21
Sorry, I'm only talking about Hersh, whose career seems to be paralleling Bernstein's. randome May 2015 #25
New Yorker, FTR OilemFirchen May 2015 #44
Exactly - the end justifies all means gratuitous May 2015 #24
It's important to me because our Gov't was not honest. dixiegrrrrl May 2015 #29
BINGO! You can't build Democracy on lies. Octafish May 2015 #33
EXACTLY !!! - And Some People Are Pefectly Comfortable With Being Lied To... WillyT May 2015 #35
EXACTLY grasswire May 2015 #52
I like Hersh and have always admired his journalism but in this case, I don't think he published OregonBlue May 2015 #38
And here come the authoritarian "intelligence experts" whatchamacallit May 2015 #4
Like Forrest Gump's shrimp menu reddread May 2015 #5
It is all so sad and predictable. Vattel May 2015 #11
Yep... "What's The Big Deal ?" Abouth The Government Lying... WillyT May 2015 #39
Abu Grahib. dixiegrrrrl May 2015 #58
Hey! We got bin Laden!! FlatBaroque May 2015 #12
I don't get why it matters. Sounds like "Benghazi" to me. Hoyt May 2015 #6
Post 11 was written for people like you. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #13
Heck, that's worse than the OP. That doesn't answer why it matters. Hoyt May 2015 #23
Here is one very important reason why this is important. TM99 May 2015 #7
It will be proven when there is, you know, proof. Or even evidence. randome May 2015 #16
So you have access to all the same sourses that Hersh had. interesting. nt Javaman May 2015 #26
If Hersh wants to be believed, he needs to publish evidence, not hearsay. randome May 2015 #31
LOL Javaman May 2015 #50
if true, we really do live in Orwell's world PowerToThePeople May 2015 #8
The only reason the Nation wants to take it seriously is it could potentially hurt Clinton wyldwolf May 2015 #9
Do regale us with tales of your advanced Bullshit Detector. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #17
Irrelevant reply wyldwolf May 2015 #19
That's right. Run away. Run away. DisgustipatedinCA May 2015 #20
That's right change the subject change the subject wyldwolf May 2015 #48
ahh yes, a well thought out retort. Javaman May 2015 #28
It doesn't take much thought to reply to irrelevant reply wyldwolf May 2015 #49
and again, attacking me rather than giving facts Javaman May 2015 #51
you seem concerned stonecutter357 May 2015 #10
Wait; would this be revelation of a.....government conspiracy?? WinkyDink May 2015 #15
Opus Dei. JaneyVee May 2015 #18
I don't believe anything.. sendero May 2015 #22
Though Hersh may have gotten a sentence right does not make his story correct. Thinkingabout May 2015 #27
It's all part of the grand narrative... CanSocDem May 2015 #30
Never seen a claim that bin Laden single-handedly did anything. OilemFirchen May 2015 #45
The facts in this report did not hold up to scrutiny Gothmog May 2015 #32
It holds up better that you think. Maedhros May 2015 #53
R.J. Hillhouse in 2011: ''The story of how bin Laden was found is fiction'' Octafish May 2015 #55
Unfortunately, the authoritarians will bow to whatever the Leader Figure says. Maedhros May 2015 #56
As those on the ends of the teeter totter glare at each other, the crooks get away with the cash. Octafish May 2015 #57
k and r nashville_brook May 2015 #34
The Nation should be embarrassed for printing such nonsense. tritsofme May 2015 #36
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT May 2015 #37
that also lines up with Bhutto saying he was dead by '07: when someone's "diasppeared" MisterP May 2015 #46
Anonymous retired Pakistani intelligence officer is his source? redstateblues May 2015 #47
See post #53. Maedhros May 2015 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why We Need to Take Sy He...»Reply #57