Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(23,272 posts)

2. AFAIK, no ones naming them. It's just obvious from the police report

Sat May 23, 2015, 05:12 PM

May 2015

their ages are given and their parents are listed as Michelle and Jim Bob...

Pretty easy to work it out.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think it's disgraceful that the victim Duggar siblings have been named. [View all] boston bean May 2015 OP

Have they been publicly named? historylovr May 2015 #1

AFAIK, no ones naming them. It's just obvious from the police report riderinthestorm May 2015 #2

They were minors when it occcured every bit of identifying information boston bean May 2015 #5

Agree! It's disgusting the girls were molested. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #8