Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(34,648 posts)

6. I don't think they were named. They were just the only female Duggars born at the time.

Sat May 23, 2015, 06:03 PM

May 2015

Makes it obvious who the victims might be.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think it's disgraceful that the victim Duggar siblings have been named. [View all] boston bean May 2015 OP

Have they been publicly named? historylovr May 2015 #1

AFAIK, no ones naming them. It's just obvious from the police report riderinthestorm May 2015 #2

They were minors when it occcured every bit of identifying information boston bean May 2015 #5

Agree! It's disgusting the girls were molested. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #8